A New Approach to Helping the Hard to Place Unemployed: The Promise of Developing New Knowledge in an Interactive and Collaborative Process

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)
125 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The reforms of the social and employment services that have swept across most of the developed world since the 1990s have enormously expanded the groups of citizens receiving active employment measures. Nevertheless, up until now, most countries have only seen limited results from enhancing the labour market participation of the most vulnerable groups. We argue that the goal of including a greater share of the harder-to-place unemployed in the labour market is not likely to be achieved through the tried and tested ways of developing knowledge, policy and practice. Rather, we propose a different approach to generating and exchanging the necessary knowledge for developing active employment policy and practice. As an alternative to the evidence-based knowledge paradigm, we set up a model for knowledge production that is made through co-operation between practice and research. This model investigates the potential for integrated services and for co-production by acknowledging the importance of the experiences of frontline professionals and clients in developing employment services
Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Security
Volume19
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)335-352
Number of pages18
ISSN1388-2627
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2017

Fingerprint

employment service
labor market
knowledge
employment policy
coproduction
knowledge production
mobile social services
Group
paradigm
citizen
reform
participation
evidence
experience

Cite this

@article{943da82d1cfd4871b7af2ad00a37a57c,
title = "A New Approach to Helping the Hard to Place Unemployed: The Promise of Developing New Knowledge in an Interactive and Collaborative Process",
abstract = "The reforms of the social and employment services that have swept across most of the developed world since the 1990s have enormously expanded the groups of citizens receiving active employment measures. Nevertheless, up until now, most countries have only seen limited results from enhancing the labour market participation of the most vulnerable groups. We argue that the goal of including a greater share of the harder-to-place unemployed in the labour market is not likely to be achieved through the tried and tested ways of developing knowledge, policy and practice. Rather, we propose a different approach to generating and exchanging the necessary knowledge for developing active employment policy and practice. As an alternative to the evidence-based knowledge paradigm, we set up a model for knowledge production that is made through co-operation between practice and research. This model investigates the potential for integrated services and for co-production by acknowledging the importance of the experiences of frontline professionals and clients in developing employment services",
keywords = "Employment services, evidence-based practice, innovation, knowledge-production, employment policies",
author = "Niklas Andersen and Dorte Caswell and Flemming Larsen",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1388262717745193",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "335--352",
journal = "European Journal of Social Security",
issn = "1388-2627",
publisher = "Intersentia N.V.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A New Approach to Helping the Hard to Place Unemployed

T2 - The Promise of Developing New Knowledge in an Interactive and Collaborative Process

AU - Andersen, Niklas

AU - Caswell, Dorte

AU - Larsen, Flemming

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - The reforms of the social and employment services that have swept across most of the developed world since the 1990s have enormously expanded the groups of citizens receiving active employment measures. Nevertheless, up until now, most countries have only seen limited results from enhancing the labour market participation of the most vulnerable groups. We argue that the goal of including a greater share of the harder-to-place unemployed in the labour market is not likely to be achieved through the tried and tested ways of developing knowledge, policy and practice. Rather, we propose a different approach to generating and exchanging the necessary knowledge for developing active employment policy and practice. As an alternative to the evidence-based knowledge paradigm, we set up a model for knowledge production that is made through co-operation between practice and research. This model investigates the potential for integrated services and for co-production by acknowledging the importance of the experiences of frontline professionals and clients in developing employment services

AB - The reforms of the social and employment services that have swept across most of the developed world since the 1990s have enormously expanded the groups of citizens receiving active employment measures. Nevertheless, up until now, most countries have only seen limited results from enhancing the labour market participation of the most vulnerable groups. We argue that the goal of including a greater share of the harder-to-place unemployed in the labour market is not likely to be achieved through the tried and tested ways of developing knowledge, policy and practice. Rather, we propose a different approach to generating and exchanging the necessary knowledge for developing active employment policy and practice. As an alternative to the evidence-based knowledge paradigm, we set up a model for knowledge production that is made through co-operation between practice and research. This model investigates the potential for integrated services and for co-production by acknowledging the importance of the experiences of frontline professionals and clients in developing employment services

KW - Employment services

KW - evidence-based practice

KW - innovation

KW - knowledge-production

KW - employment policies

U2 - 10.1177/1388262717745193

DO - 10.1177/1388262717745193

M3 - Journal article

VL - 19

SP - 335

EP - 352

JO - European Journal of Social Security

JF - European Journal of Social Security

SN - 1388-2627

IS - 4

ER -