A randomized placebo-controlled phase II study of clarithromycin or placebo combined with VCD induction therapy prior to high-dose melphalan with stem cell support in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Henrik Gregersen, Trung Do, Ida Bruun Kristensen, Ulf Christian Frølund, Niels Frost Andersen, Lene Kongsgaard Nielsen, Christen Lykkegaard Andersen, Tobias Wirenfeldt Klausen, Annette Juul Vangsted, Niels Abildgaard

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
238 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: The objective of this randomized placebo-controlled study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of clarithromycin in combination with bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (VCD) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma eligible for high-dose therapy.

Methods: Patients were randomized to receive tablet clarithromycin 500 mg or matching placebo tablet twice daily during the first 3 cycles of VCD induction therapy. Primary endpoint was to compare the rate of very good partial response (VGPR) or better response after three cycles of VCD combined with clarithromycin or placebo.

Results: The study was prematurely stopped for safety reasons after the inclusion of 58 patients (36% of the planned study population). The patients were randomly assigned to clarithromycin (n = 27) or placebo (n = 31). VGPR or better response after the VCD induction therapy was obtained in 12 patients (44.4%, 95% CI 25.5-64.7) and in 16 patients (51.6%, 33.1-69.8) (p = 0.59) in the clarithromycin group and the placebo group, respectively. Seven patients (25.9%) in the clarithromycin group developed severe gastrointestinal complications (≥ grade 3) comprising pain, neutropenic enterocolitis, paralytic ileus or peptic ulcer. These complications occurred in only one patient in the placebo group. Septicemia with Gram negative bacteria was observed in 5 patients in the clarithromycin group in contrast to one case of pneumococcal septicemia in the placebo group. Patient-reported QoL were negatively affected in the clarithromycin group compared to the placebo group.

Conclusion: The study was prematurely stopped due to serious adverse events, in particular serious gastrointestinal complications and septicemia. The response data do not suggest any effect of clarithromycin when added to the VCD regimen. The combination of clarithromycin and bortezomib containing regimens is toxic and do not seem to offer extra anti-myeloma efficacy.Trial registration EudraCT (no. 2014-002187-32, registered 7 October 2014, https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2014-002187-32/DK) and ClinicalTrials.gov (no NCT02573935, retrospectively registered 12 October 2015, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02573935?term=Gregersen&cntry=DK&rank=9).

Original languageEnglish
Article number18
JournalExperimental Hematology & Oncology
Volume7
Issue number1
Number of pages8
ISSN2162-3619
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Adverse drug event
  • Bortezomib
  • Clarithromycin
  • Double blind study
  • Induction chemotherapy
  • Multiple myeloma

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A randomized placebo-controlled phase II study of clarithromycin or placebo combined with VCD induction therapy prior to high-dose melphalan with stem cell support in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this