Accessible Knowledge - Knowledge on Accessibility

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Although serious efforts are made internationally and nationally, it is a slow process to make our physical environment
accessible. In the actual design process, architects play a major role. But what kinds of knowledge, including research-based knowledge,
do practicing architects make use of when designing accessible environments? The answer to the question is crucially important since it
affects how knowledge is distributed and how accessibility can be ensured. In order to get first-hand knowledge about the design
process and the sources from which they gain knowledge, 11 qualitative interviews were conducted with architects with experience of
designing for accessibility. The analysis draws on two theoretical distinctions. The first is research-based knowledge versus knowledge
used by architects. The second is context-independent knowledge versus context-dependent knowledge. The practitioners found their
primary support in context-dependent knowledge, whereas context-independent knowledge was criticized as being too prescriptive.
Further, they tended to ask for assistance from the researcher in person rather than reading research publications. The findings
challenge research in two ways—first, to produce context-dependent knowledge to structure the first step of the design process, second,
to develop new ways to ensure a knowledge flow between research and practice.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Civil Engineering and Architecture
Volume9
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)534-546
ISSN1934-7359
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

architect
qualitative interview
assistance
human being
knowledge
experience

Keywords

    Cite this

    @article{747fc48626c9450da1b6e2966b34c385,
    title = "Accessible Knowledge - Knowledge on Accessibility",
    abstract = "Although serious efforts are made internationally and nationally, it is a slow process to make our physical environment accessible. In the actual design process, architects play a major role. But what kinds of knowledge, including research-based knowledge, do practicing architects make use of when designing accessible environments? The answer to the question is crucially important since it affects how knowledge is distributed and how accessibility can be ensured. In order to get first-hand knowledge about the design process and the sources from which they gain knowledge, 11 qualitative interviews were conducted with architects with experience of designing for accessibility. The analysis draws on two theoretical distinctions. The first is research-based knowledge versus knowledge used by architects. The second is context-independent knowledge versus context-dependent knowledge. The practitioners found their primary support in context-dependent knowledge, whereas context-independent knowledge was criticized as being too prescriptive. Further, they tended to ask for assistance from the researcher in person rather than reading research publications. The findings challenge research in two ways—first, to produce context-dependent knowledge to structure the first step of the design process, second, to develop new ways to ensure a knowledge flow between research and practice.",
    keywords = "Accessibility, inclusion, context-dependent knowledge, context-independent knowledge, knowledge flow, phronesis",
    author = "Kirkeby, {Inge Mette}",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.17265/1934-7359/2015.05.005",
    language = "English",
    volume = "9",
    pages = "534--546",
    journal = "Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture",
    issn = "1934-7359",
    publisher = "David Publishing Co., Inc.",
    number = "5",

    }

    Accessible Knowledge - Knowledge on Accessibility. / Kirkeby, Inge Mette.

    In: Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Vol. 9, No. 5, 2015, p. 534-546.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Accessible Knowledge - Knowledge on Accessibility

    AU - Kirkeby, Inge Mette

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - Although serious efforts are made internationally and nationally, it is a slow process to make our physical environment accessible. In the actual design process, architects play a major role. But what kinds of knowledge, including research-based knowledge, do practicing architects make use of when designing accessible environments? The answer to the question is crucially important since it affects how knowledge is distributed and how accessibility can be ensured. In order to get first-hand knowledge about the design process and the sources from which they gain knowledge, 11 qualitative interviews were conducted with architects with experience of designing for accessibility. The analysis draws on two theoretical distinctions. The first is research-based knowledge versus knowledge used by architects. The second is context-independent knowledge versus context-dependent knowledge. The practitioners found their primary support in context-dependent knowledge, whereas context-independent knowledge was criticized as being too prescriptive. Further, they tended to ask for assistance from the researcher in person rather than reading research publications. The findings challenge research in two ways—first, to produce context-dependent knowledge to structure the first step of the design process, second, to develop new ways to ensure a knowledge flow between research and practice.

    AB - Although serious efforts are made internationally and nationally, it is a slow process to make our physical environment accessible. In the actual design process, architects play a major role. But what kinds of knowledge, including research-based knowledge, do practicing architects make use of when designing accessible environments? The answer to the question is crucially important since it affects how knowledge is distributed and how accessibility can be ensured. In order to get first-hand knowledge about the design process and the sources from which they gain knowledge, 11 qualitative interviews were conducted with architects with experience of designing for accessibility. The analysis draws on two theoretical distinctions. The first is research-based knowledge versus knowledge used by architects. The second is context-independent knowledge versus context-dependent knowledge. The practitioners found their primary support in context-dependent knowledge, whereas context-independent knowledge was criticized as being too prescriptive. Further, they tended to ask for assistance from the researcher in person rather than reading research publications. The findings challenge research in two ways—first, to produce context-dependent knowledge to structure the first step of the design process, second, to develop new ways to ensure a knowledge flow between research and practice.

    KW - Accessibility, inclusion, context-dependent knowledge, context-independent knowledge, knowledge flow, phronesis

    U2 - 10.17265/1934-7359/2015.05.005

    DO - 10.17265/1934-7359/2015.05.005

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 9

    SP - 534

    EP - 546

    JO - Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture

    JF - Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture

    SN - 1934-7359

    IS - 5

    ER -