Acoustic regulations for offices – Comparison between selected countries in Europe

Birgit Rasmussen, Teresa Carrascal García

Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/conference proceedingArticle in proceedingResearchpeer-review

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Regulatory acoustic requirements for offices exist in some countries in Europe, but most countries have either no regulatory limits or only recommendations. The main reason for considering acoustic conditions in office premises is to ensure satisfactory working conditions for the various tasks and activities taking place in the many different kinds of rooms. Examples of room types are offices, meeting rooms, open-plan offices, reception areas, corridors, stairwells, canteens, all with different acoustic needs. The extent of acoustic limit values vary considerably between countries. Some specify a few only, while others define several criteria. The findings from a comparative study carried out in selected countries in various geographical parts of Europe show a diversity of acoustic descriptors and limit values. The paper includes examples of criteria for reverberation time, airborne and impact sound insulation, noise from traffic and from service equipment. The discrepancies between countries are discussed, aiming at potential learning and implementation of optimized limit values for more room types. In addition to regulations or guidelines, some countries have offices included in national acoustic classification schemes with different acoustic quality levels, and references are made to publications with examples of such classification criteria.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of Inter-Noise 2019
Number of pages10
Place of PublicationMadrid
Publication date2019
ISBN (Electronic)ISBN: 978-84-87985-31-7
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Event48th International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering - IFEMA Palacio Municipal Congress Centre, Madrid, Spain
Duration: 16 Jun 201919 Jun 2019
http://internoise2019.org/

Conference

Conference48th International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering
LocationIFEMA Palacio Municipal Congress Centre
CountrySpain
CityMadrid
Period16/06/201919/06/2019
Internet address
SeriesNoise-Con Proceedings
ISSN0736-2935

Fingerprint

acoustics
rooms
corridors
reverberation
recommendations
insulation
learning
traffic
requirements

Bibliographical note

PROCEEDINGS INTERNOISE 2019
ISSN: 0105-175x
ISBN: 978-84-87985-31-7
DESIGN AND COMPOSITION: Antonio Calvo-Manzano (SEA); E-mail: calvomanzano@sea-acustica.es

Keywords

  • building acoustics
  • acoustic regulations
  • offices
  • office buildings
  • Europe

Cite this

Rasmussen, B., & Carrascal García, T. (2019). Acoustic regulations for offices – Comparison between selected countries in Europe. In Proceedings of Inter-Noise 2019 Madrid. Noise-Con Proceedings
Rasmussen, Birgit ; Carrascal García, Teresa. / Acoustic regulations for offices – Comparison between selected countries in Europe. Proceedings of Inter-Noise 2019. Madrid, 2019. (Noise-Con Proceedings).
@inproceedings{009d3fde16be4a91abe0fe4d44bd197c,
title = "Acoustic regulations for offices – Comparison between selected countries in Europe",
abstract = "Regulatory acoustic requirements for offices exist in some countries in Europe, but most countries have either no regulatory limits or only recommendations. The main reason for considering acoustic conditions in office premises is to ensure satisfactory working conditions for the various tasks and activities taking place in the many different kinds of rooms. Examples of room types are offices, meeting rooms, open-plan offices, reception areas, corridors, stairwells, canteens, all with different acoustic needs. The extent of acoustic limit values vary considerably between countries. Some specify a few only, while others define several criteria. The findings from a comparative study carried out in selected countries in various geographical parts of Europe show a diversity of acoustic descriptors and limit values. The paper includes examples of criteria for reverberation time, airborne and impact sound insulation, noise from traffic and from service equipment. The discrepancies between countries are discussed, aiming at potential learning and implementation of optimized limit values for more room types. In addition to regulations or guidelines, some countries have offices included in national acoustic classification schemes with different acoustic quality levels, and references are made to publications with examples of such classification criteria.",
keywords = "building acoustics, acoustic regulations, offices, office buildings, Europe",
author = "Birgit Rasmussen and {Carrascal Garc{\'i}a}, Teresa",
note = "PROCEEDINGS INTERNOISE 2019 ISSN: 0105-175x ISBN: 978-84-87985-31-7 DESIGN AND COMPOSITION: Antonio Calvo-Manzano (SEA); E-mail: calvomanzano@sea-acustica.es",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
booktitle = "Proceedings of Inter-Noise 2019",

}

Rasmussen, B & Carrascal García, T 2019, Acoustic regulations for offices – Comparison between selected countries in Europe. in Proceedings of Inter-Noise 2019. Madrid, Noise-Con Proceedings, 48th International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering, Madrid, Spain, 16/06/2019.

Acoustic regulations for offices – Comparison between selected countries in Europe. / Rasmussen, Birgit; Carrascal García, Teresa.

Proceedings of Inter-Noise 2019. Madrid, 2019. (Noise-Con Proceedings).

Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/conference proceedingArticle in proceedingResearchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Acoustic regulations for offices – Comparison between selected countries in Europe

AU - Rasmussen, Birgit

AU - Carrascal García, Teresa

N1 - PROCEEDINGS INTERNOISE 2019 ISSN: 0105-175x ISBN: 978-84-87985-31-7 DESIGN AND COMPOSITION: Antonio Calvo-Manzano (SEA); E-mail: calvomanzano@sea-acustica.es

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Regulatory acoustic requirements for offices exist in some countries in Europe, but most countries have either no regulatory limits or only recommendations. The main reason for considering acoustic conditions in office premises is to ensure satisfactory working conditions for the various tasks and activities taking place in the many different kinds of rooms. Examples of room types are offices, meeting rooms, open-plan offices, reception areas, corridors, stairwells, canteens, all with different acoustic needs. The extent of acoustic limit values vary considerably between countries. Some specify a few only, while others define several criteria. The findings from a comparative study carried out in selected countries in various geographical parts of Europe show a diversity of acoustic descriptors and limit values. The paper includes examples of criteria for reverberation time, airborne and impact sound insulation, noise from traffic and from service equipment. The discrepancies between countries are discussed, aiming at potential learning and implementation of optimized limit values for more room types. In addition to regulations or guidelines, some countries have offices included in national acoustic classification schemes with different acoustic quality levels, and references are made to publications with examples of such classification criteria.

AB - Regulatory acoustic requirements for offices exist in some countries in Europe, but most countries have either no regulatory limits or only recommendations. The main reason for considering acoustic conditions in office premises is to ensure satisfactory working conditions for the various tasks and activities taking place in the many different kinds of rooms. Examples of room types are offices, meeting rooms, open-plan offices, reception areas, corridors, stairwells, canteens, all with different acoustic needs. The extent of acoustic limit values vary considerably between countries. Some specify a few only, while others define several criteria. The findings from a comparative study carried out in selected countries in various geographical parts of Europe show a diversity of acoustic descriptors and limit values. The paper includes examples of criteria for reverberation time, airborne and impact sound insulation, noise from traffic and from service equipment. The discrepancies between countries are discussed, aiming at potential learning and implementation of optimized limit values for more room types. In addition to regulations or guidelines, some countries have offices included in national acoustic classification schemes with different acoustic quality levels, and references are made to publications with examples of such classification criteria.

KW - building acoustics

KW - acoustic regulations

KW - offices

KW - office buildings

KW - Europe

M3 - Article in proceeding

BT - Proceedings of Inter-Noise 2019

CY - Madrid

ER -

Rasmussen B, Carrascal García T. Acoustic regulations for offices – Comparison between selected countries in Europe. In Proceedings of Inter-Noise 2019. Madrid. 2019. (Noise-Con Proceedings).