Actor-Network versus Network Analysis versus Digital Networks: Are We Talking about the Same Networks?

Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper discusses the differences and affinities among three types of networks (namely Actor-Networks, Social Networks and Digital Networks) that are playing an increasingly important role in digital STS. In the last few decades, the notion of networks has slowly but steadily struck root across broad strands of STS research. It started with the advent of actor-network theory, which provided a convenient instrument to describe the construction work of socio-technical phenomena. Then came network analysis, and scholars who imported into STS the techniques of investigation and visualization developed in the tradition of social network analysis and scientometrics. Finally, with the increasing ‘computerization’ of STS, scholars turned their attention to digital networks as a way of tracing collective life. Many researchers have more or less explicitly tried to link these three movements in one coherent set of digital methods, betting on the idea that actor-network theory can be operationalized through network analysis thanks to the data provided by digital networks. Yet, to be honest, the affinity between these three objects is sketchy at best. Besides the homonym ‘network’, there is little to is little to show for it. Are we sure that we are talking about the same thing?
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationDigital STS : A Field Guide for Science & Technology Studies
EditorsJanet Vertesi, David Ribes
Place of PublicationPrinceton, New Jersey, USA
PublisherPrinceton University Press
Publication date7 May 2019
Pages510-524
Chapter32
ISBN (Print)9780691187075, 9780691187082
ISBN (Electronic)9780691190600
Publication statusPublished - 7 May 2019

Fingerprint

network analysis
actor-network-theory
social network
visualization

Keywords

  • ANT
  • Actor-Network Theory
  • Digital Methods
  • Network Science
  • Network Analysis
  • Gephi
  • SNA
  • Social Network Analysis
  • STS
  • Controversy Mapping

Cite this

Venturini, T., Munk, A. K., & Jacomy, M. (2019). Actor-Network versus Network Analysis versus Digital Networks: Are We Talking about the Same Networks? In J. Vertesi, & D. Ribes (Eds.), Digital STS: A Field Guide for Science & Technology Studies (pp. 510-524). Princeton, New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press.
Venturini, Tommaso ; Munk, Anders Kristian ; Jacomy, Mathieu. / Actor-Network versus Network Analysis versus Digital Networks : Are We Talking about the Same Networks?. Digital STS: A Field Guide for Science & Technology Studies. editor / Janet Vertesi ; David Ribes. Princeton, New Jersey, USA : Princeton University Press, 2019. pp. 510-524
@inbook{0713dfb0b1fe43e19e4be6c701a04af1,
title = "Actor-Network versus Network Analysis versus Digital Networks: Are We Talking about the Same Networks?",
abstract = "This paper discusses the differences and affinities among three types of networks (namely Actor-Networks, Social Networks and Digital Networks) that are playing an increasingly important role in digital STS. In the last few decades, the notion of networks has slowly but steadily struck root across broad strands of STS research. It started with the advent of actor-network theory, which provided a convenient instrument to describe the construction work of socio-technical phenomena. Then came network analysis, and scholars who imported into STS the techniques of investigation and visualization developed in the tradition of social network analysis and scientometrics. Finally, with the increasing ‘computerization’ of STS, scholars turned their attention to digital networks as a way of tracing collective life. Many researchers have more or less explicitly tried to link these three movements in one coherent set of digital methods, betting on the idea that actor-network theory can be operationalized through network analysis thanks to the data provided by digital networks. Yet, to be honest, the affinity between these three objects is sketchy at best. Besides the homonym ‘network’, there is little to is little to show for it. Are we sure that we are talking about the same thing?",
keywords = "ANT, Actor-Network Theory, Digital Methods, Network Science, Network Analysis, Gephi, SNA, Social Network Analysis, STS, Controversy Mapping",
author = "Tommaso Venturini and Munk, {Anders Kristian} and Mathieu Jacomy",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "7",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780691187075",
pages = "510--524",
editor = "Vertesi, {Janet } and David Ribes",
booktitle = "Digital STS",
publisher = "Princeton University Press",

}

Venturini, T, Munk, AK & Jacomy, M 2019, Actor-Network versus Network Analysis versus Digital Networks: Are We Talking about the Same Networks? in J Vertesi & D Ribes (eds), Digital STS: A Field Guide for Science & Technology Studies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA, pp. 510-524.

Actor-Network versus Network Analysis versus Digital Networks : Are We Talking about the Same Networks? / Venturini, Tommaso; Munk, Anders Kristian; Jacomy, Mathieu.

Digital STS: A Field Guide for Science & Technology Studies. ed. / Janet Vertesi; David Ribes. Princeton, New Jersey, USA : Princeton University Press, 2019. p. 510-524.

Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Actor-Network versus Network Analysis versus Digital Networks

T2 - Are We Talking about the Same Networks?

AU - Venturini, Tommaso

AU - Munk, Anders Kristian

AU - Jacomy, Mathieu

PY - 2019/5/7

Y1 - 2019/5/7

N2 - This paper discusses the differences and affinities among three types of networks (namely Actor-Networks, Social Networks and Digital Networks) that are playing an increasingly important role in digital STS. In the last few decades, the notion of networks has slowly but steadily struck root across broad strands of STS research. It started with the advent of actor-network theory, which provided a convenient instrument to describe the construction work of socio-technical phenomena. Then came network analysis, and scholars who imported into STS the techniques of investigation and visualization developed in the tradition of social network analysis and scientometrics. Finally, with the increasing ‘computerization’ of STS, scholars turned their attention to digital networks as a way of tracing collective life. Many researchers have more or less explicitly tried to link these three movements in one coherent set of digital methods, betting on the idea that actor-network theory can be operationalized through network analysis thanks to the data provided by digital networks. Yet, to be honest, the affinity between these three objects is sketchy at best. Besides the homonym ‘network’, there is little to is little to show for it. Are we sure that we are talking about the same thing?

AB - This paper discusses the differences and affinities among three types of networks (namely Actor-Networks, Social Networks and Digital Networks) that are playing an increasingly important role in digital STS. In the last few decades, the notion of networks has slowly but steadily struck root across broad strands of STS research. It started with the advent of actor-network theory, which provided a convenient instrument to describe the construction work of socio-technical phenomena. Then came network analysis, and scholars who imported into STS the techniques of investigation and visualization developed in the tradition of social network analysis and scientometrics. Finally, with the increasing ‘computerization’ of STS, scholars turned their attention to digital networks as a way of tracing collective life. Many researchers have more or less explicitly tried to link these three movements in one coherent set of digital methods, betting on the idea that actor-network theory can be operationalized through network analysis thanks to the data provided by digital networks. Yet, to be honest, the affinity between these three objects is sketchy at best. Besides the homonym ‘network’, there is little to is little to show for it. Are we sure that we are talking about the same thing?

KW - ANT

KW - Actor-Network Theory

KW - Digital Methods

KW - Network Science

KW - Network Analysis

KW - Gephi

KW - SNA

KW - Social Network Analysis

KW - STS

KW - Controversy Mapping

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 9780691187075

SN - 9780691187082

SP - 510

EP - 524

BT - Digital STS

A2 - Vertesi, Janet

A2 - Ribes, David

PB - Princeton University Press

CY - Princeton, New Jersey, USA

ER -

Venturini T, Munk AK, Jacomy M. Actor-Network versus Network Analysis versus Digital Networks: Are We Talking about the Same Networks? In Vertesi J, Ribes D, editors, Digital STS: A Field Guide for Science & Technology Studies. Princeton, New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press. 2019. p. 510-524