An Arts on Prescription Programme: Perspectives of the Cultural Institutions

Anita Jensen, Lars Ole Bonde

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research on Arts on Prescription (AoP) programmes are on the increase and the participants’ positive mental health outcomes are well-documented. However, there is insufficient research that considers the participating cultural institutions’ perspectives. A qualitative focus group interview was conducted with the participating culture institutions in an AoP project in Denmark. Representatives from seven cultural institutions participated in the interview. The data was transcribed and analysed using Braun and Clark’s (Qual Res Psychol 3(77):77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, 2006) thematic approach. The cultural institutions were positive about the interdisciplinary collaboration with the Center for Mental Health and benefited from working with groups of people with mental health problems. They considered the collaboration to have encouraged skills development by working with groups that they did not regularly engaged with. If cultural institutions are to engage with the mental health wellbeing agenda then policy-driven initiatives can support collaborations that involve groups of people with mental health problems.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCommunity Mental Health Journal
Volume56
Issue number8
Pages (from-to)1473-1479
Number of pages7
ISSN0010-3853
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2020

Keywords

  • Arts on Prescription
  • Arts participation
  • Cultural institutions
  • Interdisciplinary collaboration
  • Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An Arts on Prescription Programme: Perspectives of the Cultural Institutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this