Analysis of the IEA 2D test. 2D, 3D, steady or unsteady airflow?

Ines Olmedo Cortes, Peter V. Nielsen

Research output: Book/ReportReportResearchpeer-review

1546 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The “IEA Annex 20 two-dimensional test case” was defined by proffesor Peter V. Nielsen (1990) and was originally considered two-dimensional and steady flow. However, some recent works considering the case as three dimensional have shown different solutions from the 2D case as well as different solutions depending on the turbulence model used in CFD simulations.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationAalborg
PublisherDepartment of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University
Number of pages9
Publication statusPublished - 2010
SeriesDCE Technical reports
Number106

Fingerprint

Steady flow
Turbulence models
Computational fluid dynamics

Keywords

  • IEA Annex 20
  • 2D
  • 3D
  • CFD simulations

Cite this

Cortes, I. O., & Nielsen, P. V. (2010). Analysis of the IEA 2D test. 2D, 3D, steady or unsteady airflow? Aalborg: Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University. DCE Technical reports, No. 106
Cortes, Ines Olmedo ; Nielsen, Peter V. / Analysis of the IEA 2D test. 2D, 3D, steady or unsteady airflow?. Aalborg : Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, 2010. 9 p. (DCE Technical reports; No. 106).
@book{72b8b7085da240cf97e4eafa36a0e674,
title = "Analysis of the IEA 2D test. 2D, 3D, steady or unsteady airflow?",
abstract = "The “IEA Annex 20 two-dimensional test case” was defined by proffesor Peter V. Nielsen (1990) and was originally considered two-dimensional and steady flow. However, some recent works considering the case as three dimensional have shown different solutions from the 2D case as well as different solutions depending on the turbulence model used in CFD simulations.",
keywords = "IEA Annex 20, 2D, 3D, CFD simulations, IEA Annex 20, 2D, 3D, CFD simulations",
author = "Cortes, {Ines Olmedo} and Nielsen, {Peter V.}",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
series = "DCE Technical reports",
publisher = "Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University",
number = "106",
address = "Denmark",

}

Cortes, IO & Nielsen, PV 2010, Analysis of the IEA 2D test. 2D, 3D, steady or unsteady airflow? DCE Technical reports, no. 106, Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, Aalborg.

Analysis of the IEA 2D test. 2D, 3D, steady or unsteady airflow? / Cortes, Ines Olmedo; Nielsen, Peter V.

Aalborg : Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, 2010. 9 p. (DCE Technical reports; No. 106).

Research output: Book/ReportReportResearchpeer-review

TY - RPRT

T1 - Analysis of the IEA 2D test. 2D, 3D, steady or unsteady airflow?

AU - Cortes, Ines Olmedo

AU - Nielsen, Peter V.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The “IEA Annex 20 two-dimensional test case” was defined by proffesor Peter V. Nielsen (1990) and was originally considered two-dimensional and steady flow. However, some recent works considering the case as three dimensional have shown different solutions from the 2D case as well as different solutions depending on the turbulence model used in CFD simulations.

AB - The “IEA Annex 20 two-dimensional test case” was defined by proffesor Peter V. Nielsen (1990) and was originally considered two-dimensional and steady flow. However, some recent works considering the case as three dimensional have shown different solutions from the 2D case as well as different solutions depending on the turbulence model used in CFD simulations.

KW - IEA Annex 20

KW - 2D

KW - 3D

KW - CFD simulations

KW - IEA Annex 20

KW - 2D

KW - 3D

KW - CFD simulations

M3 - Report

T3 - DCE Technical reports

BT - Analysis of the IEA 2D test. 2D, 3D, steady or unsteady airflow?

PB - Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University

CY - Aalborg

ER -

Cortes IO, Nielsen PV. Analysis of the IEA 2D test. 2D, 3D, steady or unsteady airflow? Aalborg: Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, 2010. 9 p. (DCE Technical reports; No. 106).