Anisotropic Stark shift, field-induced dissociation, and electroabsorption of excitons in phosphorene

Høgni Carlsson Kamban*, Thomas Garm Pedersen, N.M.R. Peres

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We compute binding energies, Stark shifts, electric-field-induced dissociation rates, and the Franz-Keldysh effect for excitons in phosphorene in various dielectric surroundings. All three effects show a pronounced dependence on the direction of the in-plane electric field with the dissociation rates, in particular, decreasing by several orders of magnitude upon rotating the electric field from the armchair to the zigzag axis. To better understand the numerical dissociation rates, we derive an analytical approximation to the anisotropic rates induced by weak electric fields thereby generalizing the previously obtained result for isotropic two-dimensional semiconductors. This approximation is shown to be valid in the weak-field limit by comparing it to the exact rates. The anisotropy is also apparent in the large difference between armchair and zigzag components of the exciton polarizability tensor, which we compute for the five lowest-lying states. As expected, we also find much more pronounced Stark shifts in either the armchair or the zigzag direction, depending on the symmetry of the state in question. Finally, an isotropic interaction potential is shown to be an excellent approximation to a more accurate anisotropic interaction derived from the Poisson equation, confirming that the anisotropy of phosphorene is largely due to the direction dependence of the effective masses.
Original languageEnglish
Article number115305
JournalPhysical Review B
Volume102
Issue number11
ISSN2469-9950
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Sept 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Anisotropic Stark shift, field-induced dissociation, and electroabsorption of excitons in phosphorene'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this