BIM and LCA integration: A systematic literature review

Tajda Potrč Obrecht, Martin Röck, Endrit Hoxha, Alexander Passer*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

122 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To foster sustainable development, the environmental impacts of the construction sector need to be reduced substantially. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is the established methodology for the quantification of environmental impacts, and therefore has been increasingly applied to assess the environmental performance of buildings. By coupling LCAs with digital design tools, e.g., building information modeling (BIM), the identification of environmental hotspots and their mitigation is possible during the design process. The objective of the study is to identify the current integration approaches, and determine the pros and cons of the integration process from different viewpoints, namely, technical, informational, organizational and functional issues. Therefore, a comprehensive systematic literature review (SLR) was performed. We identified 60 relevant BIM-LCA case studies and analyzed the applied BIM-LCA workflows in detail. A total of 16 of the reviewed studies applied LCA during the early design stage. These studies used a manual or semiautomatic data exchange between the BIM models and LCA tools. In most cases, contemporary BIM-LCA workflows utilized conventional spreadsheets (e.g., Excel sheets in 16 cases). However, the analysis shows that an automated link between LCA and BIM can be achieved when overcoming the technical, organizational and informational issues discussed in the paper. This could enable the streamlining of LCA applications in design practice, and thus support the necessary improvements in the environmental performance of buildings.

Original languageEnglish
Article number5534
JournalSustainability (Switzerland)
Volume12
Issue number14
ISSN2071-1050
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Funding: The Slovenian contribution is financially supported by the Slovenian Research Agency (Young Researcher Funding 38191). The Austrian contribution is financially supported by the Austrian Ministry for Transport, Innovation and Technology (BMVIT) via IEA Research Cooperation via the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) Grant #864142. Martin Röck is the recipient of a DOC Fellowship of the Austrian Academy of Sciences. The Open Access is funded by the Graz University of Technology.

Funding Information:
The Slovenian contribution is financially supported by the Slovenian Research Agency (Young Researcher Funding 38191). The Austrian contribution is financially supported by the Austrian Ministry for Transport, Innovation and Technology (BMVIT) via IEA Research Cooperation via the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) Grant #864142. Martin R?ck is the recipient of a DOC Fellowship of the Austrian Academy of Sciences. The Open Access is funded by the Graz University of Technology. The work was performed as a part of the IEA EBC Annex 72 (http://annex72.iea-ebc.org) Subtask 2 activity. The authors thank the expertswhoprovided useful input and sources of information. The authors would like to thank Theres Reisinger and Dominik Maierhofer for providing help with data illustration.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by the authors.

Keywords

  • Bill of quantities (BoQ)
  • Building information modeling (BIM)
  • Environmental product declarations (EPD)
  • Life cycle assessment (LCA)
  • Systematic literature review (SLR)
  • Workflow

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'BIM and LCA integration: A systematic literature review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this