Bots for Research: Minimising the Experimenter Effect

Senuri Wijenayake, Niels van Berkel, Jorge Goncalves

Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/conference proceedingArticle in proceedingResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Experimenter-induced influences can trigger biased responses from research participants. We evaluate how digital bots can be used as an alternative research tool to mitigate these biases, as based on existing literature. We note that the conversational interactivity provided by bots can significantly reduce biased responses and satisficing behaviour, while simultaneously enhancing disclosure and facilitating scalability. Bots can also build rapport with participants and explain tasks at hand as well as a human experimenter, with the added benefit of anonymity. However, bots often follow a predetermined script when conversing and therefore may not be able to handle complex and unstructured conversations, which could frustrate users. Studies also imply that bots with human-like features may induce experimenter effects as similar to humans. We conclude with a discussion on how bots could be designed for optimal utilisation in research.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAdjunct Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Number of pages9
Publication date2020
Pages1-9
Publication statusPublished - 2020
EventCHI 2020 Workshop on Detection and Design for Cognitive Biases in People and Computing Systems - Honolulu, United States
Duration: 25 Apr 2020 → …

Conference

ConferenceCHI 2020 Workshop on Detection and Design for Cognitive Biases in People and Computing Systems
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityHonolulu
Period25/04/2020 → …

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bots for Research: Minimising the Experimenter Effect'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this