Bringing the client back in: A comparison between political rationality and the experiences of the unemployed

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Categorizing the job readiness of unemployed clients is a task of the utmost importance for active labor market policies. Scholarly attention on the topic has mostly focused either on questions of political legitimacy or on how categories are practically negotiated in meetings between the welfare system and the client. This article proposes a comparative methodology, in which the political rationality of job readiness is contrasted with findings from a qualitative longitudinal study into the lived experience of recent welfare reforms. A group of 25 vulnerable Danish unemployed welfare claimants were interviewed repeatedly from 2013 to 2015 in the qualitative longitudinal study, and their accounts were compared to the political rationality on job readiness. Our analysis presents four striking areas of discrepancy between political rationality, on the one hand, and the logic of job readiness found in the vast amount of qualitative material, on the other hand. It is concluded that the specific comparative perspective is fruitful because: (i) it critically addresses the gap between the experiences of some unemployed people and the political rationality; and (ii) it adds the perspective of the targeted individuals themselves to the analysis of political categorization, thereby avoiding the well-known risk of reducing welfare clients to mere manipulable objects.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSocial Policy and Administration
Volume52
Issue number7
Pages (from-to)1441-1454
Number of pages14
ISSN0144-5596
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2018

Fingerprint

rationality
welfare
welfare reform
labor market
longitudinal study
experience
methodology
legitimacy
reform
comparison
analysis
Group
material
policy

Keywords

  • active labor market policies
  • job readiness
  • political rationality
  • qualitative longitudinal research
  • unemployment
  • welfare reforms

Cite this

@article{0d069990eae84abc83881e9fc0f8da8b,
title = "Bringing the client back in: A comparison between political rationality and the experiences of the unemployed",
abstract = "Categorizing the job readiness of unemployed clients is a task of the utmost importance for active labor market policies. Scholarly attention on the topic has mostly focused either on questions of political legitimacy or on how categories are practically negotiated in meetings between the welfare system and the client. This article proposes a comparative methodology, in which the political rationality of job readiness is contrasted with findings from a qualitative longitudinal study into the lived experience of recent welfare reforms. A group of 25 vulnerable Danish unemployed welfare claimants were interviewed repeatedly from 2013 to 2015 in the qualitative longitudinal study, and their accounts were compared to the political rationality on job readiness. Our analysis presents four striking areas of discrepancy between political rationality, on the one hand, and the logic of job readiness found in the vast amount of qualitative material, on the other hand. It is concluded that the specific comparative perspective is fruitful because: (i) it critically addresses the gap between the experiences of some unemployed people and the political rationality; and (ii) it adds the perspective of the targeted individuals themselves to the analysis of political categorization, thereby avoiding the well-known risk of reducing welfare clients to mere manipulable objects.",
keywords = "active labor market policies, job readiness, political rationality, qualitative longitudinal research, unemployment, welfare reforms",
author = "Sophie Danneris and Nielsen, {Mathias Herup}",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/spol.12386",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "1441--1454",
journal = "Social Policy and Administration",
issn = "0144-5596",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

Bringing the client back in : A comparison between political rationality and the experiences of the unemployed. / Danneris, Sophie; Nielsen, Mathias Herup.

In: Social Policy and Administration, Vol. 52, No. 7, 01.12.2018, p. 1441-1454.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bringing the client back in

T2 - A comparison between political rationality and the experiences of the unemployed

AU - Danneris, Sophie

AU - Nielsen, Mathias Herup

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Categorizing the job readiness of unemployed clients is a task of the utmost importance for active labor market policies. Scholarly attention on the topic has mostly focused either on questions of political legitimacy or on how categories are practically negotiated in meetings between the welfare system and the client. This article proposes a comparative methodology, in which the political rationality of job readiness is contrasted with findings from a qualitative longitudinal study into the lived experience of recent welfare reforms. A group of 25 vulnerable Danish unemployed welfare claimants were interviewed repeatedly from 2013 to 2015 in the qualitative longitudinal study, and their accounts were compared to the political rationality on job readiness. Our analysis presents four striking areas of discrepancy between political rationality, on the one hand, and the logic of job readiness found in the vast amount of qualitative material, on the other hand. It is concluded that the specific comparative perspective is fruitful because: (i) it critically addresses the gap between the experiences of some unemployed people and the political rationality; and (ii) it adds the perspective of the targeted individuals themselves to the analysis of political categorization, thereby avoiding the well-known risk of reducing welfare clients to mere manipulable objects.

AB - Categorizing the job readiness of unemployed clients is a task of the utmost importance for active labor market policies. Scholarly attention on the topic has mostly focused either on questions of political legitimacy or on how categories are practically negotiated in meetings between the welfare system and the client. This article proposes a comparative methodology, in which the political rationality of job readiness is contrasted with findings from a qualitative longitudinal study into the lived experience of recent welfare reforms. A group of 25 vulnerable Danish unemployed welfare claimants were interviewed repeatedly from 2013 to 2015 in the qualitative longitudinal study, and their accounts were compared to the political rationality on job readiness. Our analysis presents four striking areas of discrepancy between political rationality, on the one hand, and the logic of job readiness found in the vast amount of qualitative material, on the other hand. It is concluded that the specific comparative perspective is fruitful because: (i) it critically addresses the gap between the experiences of some unemployed people and the political rationality; and (ii) it adds the perspective of the targeted individuals themselves to the analysis of political categorization, thereby avoiding the well-known risk of reducing welfare clients to mere manipulable objects.

KW - active labor market policies

KW - job readiness

KW - political rationality

KW - qualitative longitudinal research

KW - unemployment

KW - welfare reforms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056132818&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/spol.12386

DO - 10.1111/spol.12386

M3 - Journal article

VL - 52

SP - 1441

EP - 1454

JO - Social Policy and Administration

JF - Social Policy and Administration

SN - 0144-5596

IS - 7

ER -