Projects per year
Abstract
Aim
The purpose of this study is to assess the status quo of data sharing in LCA in relation to the FAIR (findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reuse) data principles.
Methods
This study investigates how is LCA data from publicly funded research currently shared. Firstly, the focus is on life cycle inventory data shared in journal articles. Given that FAIR data sharing is not only the responsibility of the LCA practitioner, this study further investigates guidelines (e.g., data sharing standards and data management plans) and infrastructure (repositories, data formats, and nomenclature) to identify the tools and services available to LCA community which are essential to enable FAIR data sharing.
Results
The study identifies that although there is growing awareness to improve data sharing practices, implementation of FAIR guidelines for data sharing is seldom seen in practice. LCA studies that adhere to FAIR principles are primarily due to use of generic data repositories which provide tools to support data sharing. However, there is no guidance on how LCA specific data should be shared to ensure its findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability. This study suggests a workflow to enable FAIRification of LCA data. In addition, the study recommends further efforts within the LCA community on skill and technology development, strategic funding, and recognition of the best practices in relation to data sharing.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this study highlights the necessity of data sharing incentives, guidelines, and platforms/repositories specific for the LCA community.
The purpose of this study is to assess the status quo of data sharing in LCA in relation to the FAIR (findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reuse) data principles.
Methods
This study investigates how is LCA data from publicly funded research currently shared. Firstly, the focus is on life cycle inventory data shared in journal articles. Given that FAIR data sharing is not only the responsibility of the LCA practitioner, this study further investigates guidelines (e.g., data sharing standards and data management plans) and infrastructure (repositories, data formats, and nomenclature) to identify the tools and services available to LCA community which are essential to enable FAIR data sharing.
Results
The study identifies that although there is growing awareness to improve data sharing practices, implementation of FAIR guidelines for data sharing is seldom seen in practice. LCA studies that adhere to FAIR principles are primarily due to use of generic data repositories which provide tools to support data sharing. However, there is no guidance on how LCA specific data should be shared to ensure its findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability. This study suggests a workflow to enable FAIRification of LCA data. In addition, the study recommends further efforts within the LCA community on skill and technology development, strategic funding, and recognition of the best practices in relation to data sharing.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this study highlights the necessity of data sharing incentives, guidelines, and platforms/repositories specific for the LCA community.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment |
Volume | 29 |
Issue number | 4 |
Pages (from-to) | 733-744 |
Number of pages | 12 |
ISSN | 0948-3349 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 22 Jan 2024 |
Keywords
- FAIR Data Principles
- LCA practice
- data infrastructures
- data sharing practices
- Data management plan
- Data sharing
- DMP
- Data repositories
- LCA
- LCA data curation
- FAIR data
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Can LCA be FAIR? Assessing the status quo and opportunities for FAIR data sharing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Active
-
ALIGNED: Aligning Life Cycle Assessment methods and bio-based sectors for improved environmental performance
Pizzol, M. (PI), Løkke, S. (CoPI), Ghose, A. (Project Participant), Champetier, F. (Other), Lancz, K. (Project Participant) & Stakenaite, D. (Project Manager)
01/10/2022 → 30/09/2025
Project: Research
Activities
- 1 Conference presentations
-
Can LCA be FAIR? Assessing the status quo and opportunities for data sharing
Pizzol, M. (Speaker)
23 Oct 2024Activity: Talks and presentations › Conference presentations
File
Press/Media
-
Can LCA be FAIR? Assessing the status quo and opportunities for data sharing
Ghose, A. & Pizzol, M., 2024. 10 p.Research output: Contribution to conference without publisher/journal › Conference abstract for conference › Research › peer-review
File -
ALIGNED: A framework for the LCA of bio-based products
Pizzol, M., Løkke, S., Ghose, A., Bollesen, K. N., Spekreijse, J., Reumerman, P., Van Passel, S., Tschulkow, M., Hamelin, L., Watanabe, M. D., Souza, N. R. & Cherubini, F., May 2023. 1 p.Research output: Contribution to conference without publisher/journal › Conference abstract for conference › Research › peer-review
Open AccessFile -
A core ontology for modeling life cycle sustainability assessment on the Semantic Web
Ghose, A., Lissandrini, M., Hansen, E. R. & Weidema, B. P., Jun 2022, In: Journal of Industrial Ecology. 26, 3, p. 731-747 17 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Open AccessFile18 Citations (Scopus)98 Downloads (Pure)