Can we build inclusion?

Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/conference proceedingArticle in proceedingResearchpeer-review

311 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Inclusion of children with special needs in kindergartens and preschools may be approached from different angles. This paper raises the question of whether the physical framework of kindergartens makes any difference for daily life at the kindergarten at all, and whether it can support inclusion of some children with special needs. Hence the title – can we build inclusion? In the literature of Universal Design, accommodation and design features seldom reflect the less visible disabilities. The paper is based on a research project initiated to investigate how more or less space influences daily pedagogical practice in general. Twelve interviews were conducted with experienced teachers from twelve different kindergartens with different amounts of space, varying from a ratio of 2.1 m2 play area per child to 5.5 m2. The results indicated that, for a group of children with special needs in particular, the amount of space is crucial. This group consisted of children who were socially very extrovert, and who maybe were noisy, easily provoked, and quick to get involved in arguments with other children. Alternatively, children in the group were very restrained and withdrawn in social interaction. Based on the answers in the interviews, we found support for answering the question in the title in the affirmative; we can build inclusion! This is because the teachers' experience indicated that, if there was sufficient space per child, there were fewer conflicts and the children managed to stay in the same activity for a much longer period. Sufficient space made it possible to divide the children into smaller groups, and use any secluded space. Therefore, it was much easier for other children to include some children with special needs. Accordingly, we can say that, sufficient space per child and an adequate layout and furnishing of the kindergarten is an advantage for all children. This is a clear example of Universal Design in which architectural solutions that are good for one specific group are also beneficial for all children
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationUniversal Design 2016: Learning from the Past, Designing for the Future. : Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Universal Design (UD 2016), York, United Kingdom, August 21-24, 2016
EditorsHelen Petrie, Jenny Darzentas, Tanja Walsh, David Swallow, Leonardo Sandoval, Andrew Lewis, Christopher Power
Number of pages10
Place of PublicationAmsterdam
PublisherIOS Press
Publication date2016
Pages246-255
ISBN (Print)978-1-61499-683-5
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-61499-684-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
EventUniversal Design 2016 (UD2016): Learning from the past, designing for the future - University of York, York, United Kingdom
Duration: 21 Aug 201624 Aug 2016
Conference number: 3
http://ud2016.uk/

Conference

ConferenceUniversal Design 2016 (UD2016)
Number3
LocationUniversity of York
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
CityYork
Period21/08/201624/08/2016
Internet address
SeriesStudies in Health Technology and Informatics
Volume229
ISSN0926-9630

Keywords

  • Inclusion
  • Universal Design
  • Children
  • Kindergarten
  • Space

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can we build inclusion?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this