Clinical needs and preferences for AI-based explanations in clinical simulation training

Naja Kathrine Kollerup*, Stine S. Johansen, Martin Grønnebæk Tolsgaard, Mikkel Lønborg Friis, Mikael B. Skov, Niels van Berkel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Medical training is a key element in maintaining and improving today's healthcare standards. Given the nature of medical work, students must master not only theory but also develop their hands-on abilities and skills in clinical practice. Medical simulators play an increasing role in supporting the active learning of these students due to their ability to present a large variety of tasks allowing students to train and experiment indefinitely without causing any patient harm. While the criticality of explainable AI systems has been extensively discussed in the literature, the medical training context presents unique user needs for explanations. In this paper, we explore the potential gap of current limitations within simulation-based training, and the role Artificial Intelligence (AI) holds in supporting the needs of medical students in training. Through contextual inquiries and interviews with clinicians in training (N = 9) and subsequent validation with medical experts (N = 4), we obtain an understanding of the shortcomings in current simulation-based training and offer recommendations for future AI-driven training. Our results stress the need for continuous and actionable feedback that resembles the interaction between clinical supervisor and resident in real-world training scenarios while adjusting training material to the residents' skills and prior performance.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBehaviour and Information Technology
Number of pages21
ISSN0144-929X
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 Apr 2024

Keywords

  • AI support systems
  • Explanations
  • clinical
  • feedback
  • learning
  • simulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical needs and preferences for AI-based explanations in clinical simulation training'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this