Despite having the potential to improve the lives of severely paralyzed users, non-invasive Brain Computer Interfaces (BCI) have yet to be integrated into their daily lives. The widespread adoption of BCI-driven assistive technology is hindered by its lacking usability, as both end-users and researchers alike find fault with traditional EEG caps. In this paper, we compare the usability of four EEG recording devices for Steady-State Visually Evoked Potentials (SSVEP)-BCI applications: an EEG cap (active gel electrodes), two headbands (passive gel or active dry electrodes), and two adhesive electrodes placed on each mastoid. Ten able-bodied participants tested each device by completing an 8-target SSVEP paradigm. Setup times were recorded, and participants rated their satisfaction with each device. The EEG cap obtained the best classification accuracies (Median = 98.96%), followed by the gel electrode headband (Median = 93.75%), and the dry electrode headband (Median = 91.14%). The mastoid electrodes obtained classification accuracies close to chance level (Med = 29.69%). Unknowing of the classification accuracy, participants found the mastoid electrodes to be the most comfortable and discrete. The dry electrode headband obtained the lowest user satisfaction score and was criticized for being too uncomfortable. Participants also noted that the EEG cap was too conspicuous. The gel-based headband provided a good trade-off between BCI performance and user satisfaction.
|Conference||International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, ICORR 2022|
|Period||25/07/2022 → 29/07/2022|
|Series||I E E E International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. Proceedings|