Comparison of early clinical outcomes between dual antiplatelet therapy and triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Jiesuck Park, Jin-Hyung Jung, Eue-Keun Choi*, Seung-Woo Lee, Soonil Kwon, So-Ryoung Lee, Jeehoon Kang, Kyung-Do Han, Kyung Woo Park, Seil Oh, Gregory Y H Lip

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
29 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Most Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) receive only dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) without oral anticoagulants (vitamin K antagonists [VKA] or non-VKA oral anticoagulants [NOAC]). However, it has not been fully investigated whether the DAPT results in better clinical outcomes in the early period after PCI than the standard triple therapy with VKA or NOAC.

METHODS: We analyzed the claims records of 11,039 Korean AF population who had PCI between 2013 and 2018. Patients were categorized according to the post-PCI antithrombotic therapy as VKA-based triple therapy (VKA-TT), NOAC-based triple therapy (NOAC-TT), and DAPT groups. After baseline adjustment using inverse probability weighting, we compared the risks of ischemic endpoints (ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality) and major bleeding at 3 months post-PCI.

RESULTS: Ischemic stroke, MI, and all-cause mortality occurred in 105, 423, and 379 patients, respectively, and 138 patients experienced major bleeding. The DAPT group was associated with a lower risk of ischemic stroke and major bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.84) compared to the VKA-TT group, despite no significant differences in the risks of MI and all-cause mortality. In contrast, the DAPT group demonstrated no significant difference in the risks for ischemic endpoints compared to the NOAC-TT group. Additionally, the DAPT group had a numerically lower risk of major bleeding than the NOAC-TT group but this was not statistically significant (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.45-1.07).

CONCLUSIONS: An outcome benefit of DAPT was observed in the early period after PCI compared to the VKA-TT, but not against NOAC-TT users among the Asian AF population. Given the potential long-term benefits of NOACs, greater efforts should be made to increase compliance in clinical practice with proper combination therapy with NOAC after PCI.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0264538
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume17
Issue number2
ISSN1932-6203
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of early clinical outcomes between dual antiplatelet therapy and triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this