Abstract

This publication presents an in‐depth comparison of the indoor environmental quality aspect (the most prominent social sustainability aspect) on structure, content and weighting for five selected sustainable building certifications. The aim is to give the readers an insight into what the different certifications do and do not include in their indoor environmental assessment, by calculating how they prioritise indoor environmental aspects, and by giving an overview of the content covered.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationAalborg
PublisherDepartment of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University
Number of pages32
Publication statusPublished - 2019
SeriesDCE Technical Reports
Number269
ISSN1901-726X

Fingerprint

Sustainable development
Environmental assessments

Keywords

  • Sustainable building certifications
  • Certifications
  • Indoor invironment

Cite this

@book{05335ed6295344b2a1eff9a7aa8aa866,
title = "Comparison of Five Leading Sustainable Building Certifications Concerning Indoor Environmental Assessment Content",
abstract = "This publication presents an in‐depth comparison of the indoor environmental quality aspect (the most prominent social sustainability aspect) on structure, content and weighting for five selected sustainable building certifications. The aim is to give the readers an insight into what the different certifications do and do not include in their indoor environmental assessment, by calculating how they prioritise indoor environmental aspects, and by giving an overview of the content covered.",
keywords = "Sustainable building certifications, Certifications, Indoor invironment, Sustainable building certifications, Certifications, Indoor invironment",
author = "Lasse Rohde and Larsen, {Tine Steen} and Jensen, {Rasmus Lund} and Larsen, {Olena Kalyanova}",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
publisher = "Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University",

}

Comparison of Five Leading Sustainable Building Certifications Concerning Indoor Environmental Assessment Content. / Rohde, Lasse; Larsen, Tine Steen; Jensen, Rasmus Lund; Larsen, Olena Kalyanova.

Aalborg : Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, 2019. 32 p.

Research output: Book/ReportReportResearch

TY - RPRT

T1 - Comparison of Five Leading Sustainable Building Certifications Concerning Indoor Environmental Assessment Content

AU - Rohde, Lasse

AU - Larsen, Tine Steen

AU - Jensen, Rasmus Lund

AU - Larsen, Olena Kalyanova

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This publication presents an in‐depth comparison of the indoor environmental quality aspect (the most prominent social sustainability aspect) on structure, content and weighting for five selected sustainable building certifications. The aim is to give the readers an insight into what the different certifications do and do not include in their indoor environmental assessment, by calculating how they prioritise indoor environmental aspects, and by giving an overview of the content covered.

AB - This publication presents an in‐depth comparison of the indoor environmental quality aspect (the most prominent social sustainability aspect) on structure, content and weighting for five selected sustainable building certifications. The aim is to give the readers an insight into what the different certifications do and do not include in their indoor environmental assessment, by calculating how they prioritise indoor environmental aspects, and by giving an overview of the content covered.

KW - Sustainable building certifications

KW - Certifications

KW - Indoor invironment

KW - Sustainable building certifications

KW - Certifications

KW - Indoor invironment

M3 - Report

BT - Comparison of Five Leading Sustainable Building Certifications Concerning Indoor Environmental Assessment Content

PB - Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University

CY - Aalborg

ER -

Rohde L, Larsen TS, Jensen RL, Larsen OK. Comparison of Five Leading Sustainable Building Certifications Concerning Indoor Environmental Assessment Content. Aalborg: Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, 2019. 32 p. (DCE Technical Reports; No. 269).