Comparison of User Satisfaction with Four Different Lighting Concepts

Ásta Logadóttir, Anne Iversen, Jakob Markvart, Dennis Dan Corell, Anders Thorseth, Carsten Dam-Hansen

Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/conference proceedingArticle in proceedingResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This study aims at comparing user satisfaction for different lighting concepts in an office environment. The lighting concepts being compared are a conventional static lighting concept from ceiling mounted luminaires against three different types of dynamic task lighting concepts, the first providing occupant controlled task illuminance, the second concept providing occupant controlled CCT and the third providing automatically controlled CCT. Another aim is to identify which of the four lighting concepts is rated as most preferred by the test subjects. Subjects tested all four lighting concepts and questionnaires were used for rating of the concepts. Adjustable CCT of the task light was the most preferred lighting concept followed by adjustable task illuminance. Automatically controlled task CCT and conventional lighting were the least preferred. User satisfaction ratings for the lighting concepts are in the following order; Adjustable task CCT, adjustable task illuminance, automatic control of task CCT and conventional lighting.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of CIE Centenary Conference "Towards a New Century of Light"
Number of pages10
PublisherCIE
Publication dateApr 2013
Pages159-168
ChapterOP23
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-902842-44-2
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2013
EventTowards a new century of light - Paris, France
Duration: 12 Apr 201319 Apr 2013

Conference

ConferenceTowards a new century of light
Country/TerritoryFrance
CityParis
Period12/04/201319/04/2013
SeriesC I E. Publication
VolumeCIE x038:2013 (including Addendum 1)
ISSN1011-6567

Cite this