Abstract

Purpose: Construction is repeatedly criticised for its low productivity based on statistical data that do not represent the output of construction adequately. The purpose of this paper is to improve the understanding of construction output – being the numerator in construction productivity calculations – by focussing on changes in quantity of the products, product characteristics and composition of the aggregate rather than as changes in price. Design/methodology/approach: The research design of this study applies statistical data from the national accounts along with data from four paradigmatic case studies of social housing projects covering a period of 50 years. Findings: The results indicate that while construction output prices have increased threefold over the past 50 years, improvements in performance can only explain approximately 20 per cent. Research limitations/implications: The developed four-step method has demonstrated its value as a means to measure changes in the characteristics of the product, but more studies on the actual figures and results over time and regions are required before solid conclusions can be drawn. Social implications: This study has added new knowledge of construction output that supports the development of a more accurate construction statistics, which in turn can assist the design of more effective and evidence-based policies for improving construction productivity. Originality/value: This paper describes and demonstrates a novel performance-based methodology for addressing changes in the characteristics of the products in a longitudinally perspective, which can potentially provide a better understanding of changes in productivity.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEngineering, Construction and Architectural Management
Volume26
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)794-813
Number of pages20
ISSN0969-9988
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Productivity
Statistics
Chemical analysis

Keywords

  • Organization
  • Innovation
  • Process
  • Value management
  • Management
  • Productivity

Cite this

@article{83b971a09f9b4d8890e72349db30ced2,
title = "Construction productivity revisited: towards measuring performance of construction output",
abstract = "Purpose: Construction is repeatedly criticised for its low productivity based on statistical data that do not represent the output of construction adequately. The purpose of this paper is to improve the understanding of construction output – being the numerator in construction productivity calculations – by focussing on changes in quantity of the products, product characteristics and composition of the aggregate rather than as changes in price. Design/methodology/approach: The research design of this study applies statistical data from the national accounts along with data from four paradigmatic case studies of social housing projects covering a period of 50 years. Findings: The results indicate that while construction output prices have increased threefold over the past 50 years, improvements in performance can only explain approximately 20 per cent. Research limitations/implications: The developed four-step method has demonstrated its value as a means to measure changes in the characteristics of the product, but more studies on the actual figures and results over time and regions are required before solid conclusions can be drawn. Social implications: This study has added new knowledge of construction output that supports the development of a more accurate construction statistics, which in turn can assist the design of more effective and evidence-based policies for improving construction productivity. Originality/value: This paper describes and demonstrates a novel performance-based methodology for addressing changes in the characteristics of the products in a longitudinally perspective, which can potentially provide a better understanding of changes in productivity.",
keywords = "Organization, Innovation, Process, Value management, Management, Productivity",
author = "Kim Haugb{\o}lle and Larsen, {Jacob Norvig} and J{\o}rgen Nielsen",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1108/ECAM-03-2018-0094",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "794--813",
journal = "Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management",
issn = "0969-9988",
publisher = "JAI Press",
number = "5",

}

Construction productivity revisited : towards measuring performance of construction output. / Haugbølle, Kim; Larsen, Jacob Norvig; Nielsen, Jørgen.

In: Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 26, No. 5, 17.06.2019, p. 794-813.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Construction productivity revisited

T2 - towards measuring performance of construction output

AU - Haugbølle, Kim

AU - Larsen, Jacob Norvig

AU - Nielsen, Jørgen

PY - 2019/6/17

Y1 - 2019/6/17

N2 - Purpose: Construction is repeatedly criticised for its low productivity based on statistical data that do not represent the output of construction adequately. The purpose of this paper is to improve the understanding of construction output – being the numerator in construction productivity calculations – by focussing on changes in quantity of the products, product characteristics and composition of the aggregate rather than as changes in price. Design/methodology/approach: The research design of this study applies statistical data from the national accounts along with data from four paradigmatic case studies of social housing projects covering a period of 50 years. Findings: The results indicate that while construction output prices have increased threefold over the past 50 years, improvements in performance can only explain approximately 20 per cent. Research limitations/implications: The developed four-step method has demonstrated its value as a means to measure changes in the characteristics of the product, but more studies on the actual figures and results over time and regions are required before solid conclusions can be drawn. Social implications: This study has added new knowledge of construction output that supports the development of a more accurate construction statistics, which in turn can assist the design of more effective and evidence-based policies for improving construction productivity. Originality/value: This paper describes and demonstrates a novel performance-based methodology for addressing changes in the characteristics of the products in a longitudinally perspective, which can potentially provide a better understanding of changes in productivity.

AB - Purpose: Construction is repeatedly criticised for its low productivity based on statistical data that do not represent the output of construction adequately. The purpose of this paper is to improve the understanding of construction output – being the numerator in construction productivity calculations – by focussing on changes in quantity of the products, product characteristics and composition of the aggregate rather than as changes in price. Design/methodology/approach: The research design of this study applies statistical data from the national accounts along with data from four paradigmatic case studies of social housing projects covering a period of 50 years. Findings: The results indicate that while construction output prices have increased threefold over the past 50 years, improvements in performance can only explain approximately 20 per cent. Research limitations/implications: The developed four-step method has demonstrated its value as a means to measure changes in the characteristics of the product, but more studies on the actual figures and results over time and regions are required before solid conclusions can be drawn. Social implications: This study has added new knowledge of construction output that supports the development of a more accurate construction statistics, which in turn can assist the design of more effective and evidence-based policies for improving construction productivity. Originality/value: This paper describes and demonstrates a novel performance-based methodology for addressing changes in the characteristics of the products in a longitudinally perspective, which can potentially provide a better understanding of changes in productivity.

KW - Organization

KW - Innovation

KW - Process

KW - Value management

KW - Management

KW - Productivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066871979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/ECAM-03-2018-0094

DO - 10.1108/ECAM-03-2018-0094

M3 - Journal article

VL - 26

SP - 794

EP - 813

JO - Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management

JF - Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management

SN - 0969-9988

IS - 5

ER -