Corticomotor excitability reduction induced by experimental pain remains unaffected by performing a working memory task as compared to staying at rest

Dennis B Larsen, Thomas Graven-Nielsen, Rogerio P Hirata, David Seminowicz, Siobhan Schabrun, Shellie A Boudreau

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
83 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Experimental pain inhibits primary motor cortex (M1) excitability. Attenuating pain-related inhibition of M1 excitability may be useful during rehabilitation in individuals with pain. One strategy to attenuate M1 excitability is to influence prefrontal and premotor cortex activity. Working memory tasks, e.g. the two-back task (TBT), engage prefrontal and premotor cortices and may influence M1 excitability. We hypothesized that performing the TBT during pain would influence pain-related changes in M1 excitability. Participants (n = 28) received rigorous training in the TBT before baseline testing. Experimental pain was induced by injecting hypertonic saline into the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. Participants rated pain intensity on a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) every second min until pain-resolved (PR) during the performance of the TBT (n = 14) or during REST (n = 14). In the TBT, letters were presented pseudo-randomly, and accuracy and reaction time to identified letters corresponding to letters shown two times back were recorded. M1 excitability was assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded at baseline, and at PR, PR + 10, PR + 20, and PR + 30 min. Four minutes after hypertonic saline injection, the pain NRS scores were higher in the TBT group than the REST group (p = 0.009). No time × group interaction was found for MEPs (p = 0.73), but a main effect of time (p < 0.0005) revealed a reduction of MEPs at PR up until PR + 30 (p < 0.008). The TBT accuracy improved at PR + 30 in both groups (p = 0.019). In conclusion, the pain-induced reduction in corticomotor excitability was unaffected by performing a working memory task, despite greater pain in the TBT group.

Original languageEnglish
JournalExperimental Brain Research
Volume237
Issue number9
Pages (from-to)2205-2215
Number of pages11
ISSN0014-4819
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2019

Bibliographical note

DNRF121

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Motor-evoked potentials
  • Pain neuroplasticity
  • Pain perception
  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corticomotor excitability reduction induced by experimental pain remains unaffected by performing a working memory task as compared to staying at rest'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this