Counting Torture: Towards the Translation of Robust, Useful, and Inclusive Human Rights Indicators

Zahid ul Arefin Choudhury, Steffen Jensen, Toby Kelly

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

49 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The turn to quantified measures is part of an attempt to produce more objective and comprehensive data on human rights violations. However, the turn to numbers has also been criticised for forcing human rights into the limitations of statistical capacities. This paper examines the methodological issues involved in trying to make human rights violations count, highlighting the cyclical process of translating between the experiences of human rights violations, quantified forms of measurement and human rights norms. It draws on the particular experience of conducting household surveys on the prevalence of torture in Nairobi, Kathmandu, and Dhaka. The paper argues that torture and ill-treatment can be made to count in ways that is robust, useful, and inclusive by developing indicators that are embedded in locally specific practices and forms of participation. This means treating the process of counting as a matter of contextualisation rather than abstraction. Doing so can help produce new understandings of the implications of human rights violations.

Original languageEnglish
JournalNordic Journal of Human Rights
Volume36
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)132-150
Number of pages19
ISSN1891-8131
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Apr 2018

Fingerprint

human rights violation
torture
human rights
household survey
abstraction
experience
participation

Keywords

  • Human rights indicators
  • Qualitative methods
  • Quantified methods
  • Surveys
  • Torture
  • Translation

Cite this

@article{e0fdf7dd8bde415a994a62a4eda936cf,
title = "Counting Torture: Towards the Translation of Robust, Useful, and Inclusive Human Rights Indicators",
abstract = "The turn to quantified measures is part of an attempt to produce more objective and comprehensive data on human rights violations. However, the turn to numbers has also been criticised for forcing human rights into the limitations of statistical capacities. This paper examines the methodological issues involved in trying to make human rights violations count, highlighting the cyclical process of translating between the experiences of human rights violations, quantified forms of measurement and human rights norms. It draws on the particular experience of conducting household surveys on the prevalence of torture in Nairobi, Kathmandu, and Dhaka. The paper argues that torture and ill-treatment can be made to count in ways that is robust, useful, and inclusive by developing indicators that are embedded in locally specific practices and forms of participation. This means treating the process of counting as a matter of contextualisation rather than abstraction. Doing so can help produce new understandings of the implications of human rights violations.",
keywords = "Human rights indicators, Qualitative methods, Quantified methods, Surveys, Torture, Translation",
author = "{ul Arefin Choudhury}, Zahid and Steffen Jensen and Toby Kelly",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/18918131.2018.1507871",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "132--150",
journal = "Nordic Journal of Human Rights",
issn = "1891-8131",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

Counting Torture : Towards the Translation of Robust, Useful, and Inclusive Human Rights Indicators . / ul Arefin Choudhury, Zahid; Jensen, Steffen; Kelly, Toby.

In: Nordic Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 36, No. 2, 03.04.2018, p. 132-150.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Counting Torture

T2 - Towards the Translation of Robust, Useful, and Inclusive Human Rights Indicators

AU - ul Arefin Choudhury, Zahid

AU - Jensen, Steffen

AU - Kelly, Toby

PY - 2018/4/3

Y1 - 2018/4/3

N2 - The turn to quantified measures is part of an attempt to produce more objective and comprehensive data on human rights violations. However, the turn to numbers has also been criticised for forcing human rights into the limitations of statistical capacities. This paper examines the methodological issues involved in trying to make human rights violations count, highlighting the cyclical process of translating between the experiences of human rights violations, quantified forms of measurement and human rights norms. It draws on the particular experience of conducting household surveys on the prevalence of torture in Nairobi, Kathmandu, and Dhaka. The paper argues that torture and ill-treatment can be made to count in ways that is robust, useful, and inclusive by developing indicators that are embedded in locally specific practices and forms of participation. This means treating the process of counting as a matter of contextualisation rather than abstraction. Doing so can help produce new understandings of the implications of human rights violations.

AB - The turn to quantified measures is part of an attempt to produce more objective and comprehensive data on human rights violations. However, the turn to numbers has also been criticised for forcing human rights into the limitations of statistical capacities. This paper examines the methodological issues involved in trying to make human rights violations count, highlighting the cyclical process of translating between the experiences of human rights violations, quantified forms of measurement and human rights norms. It draws on the particular experience of conducting household surveys on the prevalence of torture in Nairobi, Kathmandu, and Dhaka. The paper argues that torture and ill-treatment can be made to count in ways that is robust, useful, and inclusive by developing indicators that are embedded in locally specific practices and forms of participation. This means treating the process of counting as a matter of contextualisation rather than abstraction. Doing so can help produce new understandings of the implications of human rights violations.

KW - Human rights indicators

KW - Qualitative methods

KW - Quantified methods

KW - Surveys

KW - Torture

KW - Translation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054809414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/18918131.2018.1507871

DO - 10.1080/18918131.2018.1507871

M3 - Journal article

VL - 36

SP - 132

EP - 150

JO - Nordic Journal of Human Rights

JF - Nordic Journal of Human Rights

SN - 1891-8131

IS - 2

ER -