Dark Design: Mobilities and exclusion by design

Research output: Contribution to conference without publisher/journalPaper without publisher/journalResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Any design idea or intervention in the world is based on an underpinning logic or a set of normative principles and values. At times such will be very explicit, at other times they will be unspoken and tacit. In this paper the underpinning values leading to power exercise, social exclusion, and differentiated mobilities will be explored. The paper takes point of departure in the so-called ‘mobilities turn’ in general, and the strand of ‘critical mobilities thinking’ that investigates the mundane everyday life situations. The framework of ‘Staging Mobilites’ (Jensen 2013) is at the base, but the paper extend the theoretical framing into thinking about design codes, codes of conducts, city plans, technologies, artefacts, objects, and new ways of including materialities into the mobilities analysis (e.g. Anderson & Wilie 2009; Bennett 2010; Ingold 2014; Jensen 2016; Jensen & Lanng 2016; Latour & Yanneva 2008; Vannini 2010). Empirically the paper breaches from the author’s own research into sky trains, metros, drones, and street design (e.g. Jensen 2013, 2014; Jensen & Lanng 2016) over secondary research into the social exclusion taking place by the design of infrastructure spaces and application of technologies (e.g. Graham 2010). The paper re-works how inequalities are ‘staged’ through overt and covert design ideas and interventions shaping and re-shaping the social geography of a world increasingly marked by the rights, abilities, and opportunities to move freely – or not!
Original languageEnglish
Publication date2016
Number of pages16
Publication statusPublished - 2016
EventAAG 2016: American Association of Geographers Annual Meeting - San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
Duration: 29 Mar 20162 Apr 2016

Conference

ConferenceAAG 2016
LocationSan Francisco
CountryUnited States
CitySan Francisco
Period29/03/201602/04/2016

Fingerprint

exclusion
social geography
staging
life situation
everyday life
Values
artifact
infrastructure
ability

Keywords

  • Mobilities
  • Design
  • Exclusion
  • Urban Design

Cite this

Jensen, O. B. (2016). Dark Design: Mobilities and exclusion by design. Paper presented at AAG 2016, San Francisco, United States.
Jensen, Ole B. / Dark Design : Mobilities and exclusion by design. Paper presented at AAG 2016, San Francisco, United States.16 p.
@conference{4b6ff9f4873d47edba1b28e38f79cb2f,
title = "Dark Design: Mobilities and exclusion by design",
abstract = "Any design idea or intervention in the world is based on an underpinning logic or a set of normative principles and values. At times such will be very explicit, at other times they will be unspoken and tacit. In this paper the underpinning values leading to power exercise, social exclusion, and differentiated mobilities will be explored. The paper takes point of departure in the so-called ‘mobilities turn’ in general, and the strand of ‘critical mobilities thinking’ that investigates the mundane everyday life situations. The framework of ‘Staging Mobilites’ (Jensen 2013) is at the base, but the paper extend the theoretical framing into thinking about design codes, codes of conducts, city plans, technologies, artefacts, objects, and new ways of including materialities into the mobilities analysis (e.g. Anderson & Wilie 2009; Bennett 2010; Ingold 2014; Jensen 2016; Jensen & Lanng 2016; Latour & Yanneva 2008; Vannini 2010). Empirically the paper breaches from the author’s own research into sky trains, metros, drones, and street design (e.g. Jensen 2013, 2014; Jensen & Lanng 2016) over secondary research into the social exclusion taking place by the design of infrastructure spaces and application of technologies (e.g. Graham 2010). The paper re-works how inequalities are ‘staged’ through overt and covert design ideas and interventions shaping and re-shaping the social geography of a world increasingly marked by the rights, abilities, and opportunities to move freely – or not!",
keywords = "Mobilities, Design, Exclusion, Urban Design",
author = "Jensen, {Ole B.}",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
note = "AAG 2016 : American Association of Geographers Annual Meeting ; Conference date: 29-03-2016 Through 02-04-2016",

}

Jensen, OB 2016, 'Dark Design: Mobilities and exclusion by design' Paper presented at AAG 2016, San Francisco, United States, 29/03/2016 - 02/04/2016, .

Dark Design : Mobilities and exclusion by design. / Jensen, Ole B.

2016. Paper presented at AAG 2016, San Francisco, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conference without publisher/journalPaper without publisher/journalResearchpeer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - Dark Design

T2 - Mobilities and exclusion by design

AU - Jensen, Ole B.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Any design idea or intervention in the world is based on an underpinning logic or a set of normative principles and values. At times such will be very explicit, at other times they will be unspoken and tacit. In this paper the underpinning values leading to power exercise, social exclusion, and differentiated mobilities will be explored. The paper takes point of departure in the so-called ‘mobilities turn’ in general, and the strand of ‘critical mobilities thinking’ that investigates the mundane everyday life situations. The framework of ‘Staging Mobilites’ (Jensen 2013) is at the base, but the paper extend the theoretical framing into thinking about design codes, codes of conducts, city plans, technologies, artefacts, objects, and new ways of including materialities into the mobilities analysis (e.g. Anderson & Wilie 2009; Bennett 2010; Ingold 2014; Jensen 2016; Jensen & Lanng 2016; Latour & Yanneva 2008; Vannini 2010). Empirically the paper breaches from the author’s own research into sky trains, metros, drones, and street design (e.g. Jensen 2013, 2014; Jensen & Lanng 2016) over secondary research into the social exclusion taking place by the design of infrastructure spaces and application of technologies (e.g. Graham 2010). The paper re-works how inequalities are ‘staged’ through overt and covert design ideas and interventions shaping and re-shaping the social geography of a world increasingly marked by the rights, abilities, and opportunities to move freely – or not!

AB - Any design idea or intervention in the world is based on an underpinning logic or a set of normative principles and values. At times such will be very explicit, at other times they will be unspoken and tacit. In this paper the underpinning values leading to power exercise, social exclusion, and differentiated mobilities will be explored. The paper takes point of departure in the so-called ‘mobilities turn’ in general, and the strand of ‘critical mobilities thinking’ that investigates the mundane everyday life situations. The framework of ‘Staging Mobilites’ (Jensen 2013) is at the base, but the paper extend the theoretical framing into thinking about design codes, codes of conducts, city plans, technologies, artefacts, objects, and new ways of including materialities into the mobilities analysis (e.g. Anderson & Wilie 2009; Bennett 2010; Ingold 2014; Jensen 2016; Jensen & Lanng 2016; Latour & Yanneva 2008; Vannini 2010). Empirically the paper breaches from the author’s own research into sky trains, metros, drones, and street design (e.g. Jensen 2013, 2014; Jensen & Lanng 2016) over secondary research into the social exclusion taking place by the design of infrastructure spaces and application of technologies (e.g. Graham 2010). The paper re-works how inequalities are ‘staged’ through overt and covert design ideas and interventions shaping and re-shaping the social geography of a world increasingly marked by the rights, abilities, and opportunities to move freely – or not!

KW - Mobilities

KW - Design

KW - Exclusion

KW - Urban Design

UR - http://www.aag.org/galleries/conference-files/AAG2016_Printed_Program_Full.pdf

M3 - Paper without publisher/journal

ER -

Jensen OB. Dark Design: Mobilities and exclusion by design. 2016. Paper presented at AAG 2016, San Francisco, United States.