Decision-making on outsourcing: Four snapshots spanning 47 years

R. Dekkers, A. Barlow, A. Chaudhuri, S. M. Ogden, H. Saranga, E. Williamson

Research output: Contribution to conference without publisher/journalPaper without publisher/journalResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

While strategic decision-making on outsourcing has definitely become popular in practice, the question remains how this is linked to building of theory and empirical evidence relating to its (perceived) benefits. A scoping study in the form of a systematic literature review has drawn academic literature from four snapshots of five years, covering a time-span of 47 years. A more detailed analysis shows that the development of literature on strategic decision-making on outsourcing corresponds with managerial practice in relation to the greater consideration given to risk and quality considerations in the decision-making process. There has also been growth in use of decision making frameworks and a shift in focus from decision making related to outsourcing of manufacturing to outsourcing of business processes and functions, particularly IT. While decision-making on outsourcing is still popular and so is its research, there are signs that both academics and practitioners are starting to question its foundations; a research agenda is proposed for building more adequate theory.

Original languageEnglish
Publication date1 Jan 2013
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2013
Event22nd International Conference on Production Research, ICPR 2013 - Parana, Brazil
Duration: 28 Jul 20131 Aug 2013

Conference

Conference22nd International Conference on Production Research, ICPR 2013
Country/TerritoryBrazil
CityParana
Period28/07/201301/08/2013

Keywords

  • Backsourcing
  • Decision-making
  • Longitudinal study
  • Make-or-buy decision
  • Systematic literature review
  • Theory-building

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Decision-making on outsourcing: Four snapshots spanning 47 years'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this