Abstract
The article examines how key terminology of textual criticism can be taken as a
starting point for the investigation of material aspects of contemporary poetry. The concepts in question are ‘text’ and ‘work’ as defined by Johnny Kondrup (2013). The authors take the view that the categorical definition of text and work can be supplemented by a hermeneutical dimension, thus taking various versions of works and the influence of their respective media (blog, book etc.) on the percipient into account.
In connection with the theoretical considerations, a handful of recent works by Lea Marie Løppenthin, Olga Ravn, Mikkel Thykier, Caspar Eric, and Simon Grotrian are discussed. By using the format as a point of departure rather than applying a more conventional practice of close reading, the authors argue for a broad-spectred approach to literary analysis which focuses on aspects of the conception and reception of contemporary poetry.
starting point for the investigation of material aspects of contemporary poetry. The concepts in question are ‘text’ and ‘work’ as defined by Johnny Kondrup (2013). The authors take the view that the categorical definition of text and work can be supplemented by a hermeneutical dimension, thus taking various versions of works and the influence of their respective media (blog, book etc.) on the percipient into account.
In connection with the theoretical considerations, a handful of recent works by Lea Marie Løppenthin, Olga Ravn, Mikkel Thykier, Caspar Eric, and Simon Grotrian are discussed. By using the format as a point of departure rather than applying a more conventional practice of close reading, the authors argue for a broad-spectred approach to literary analysis which focuses on aspects of the conception and reception of contemporary poetry.
Original language | Danish |
---|---|
Journal | Danske Studier |
Volume | 112 |
Pages (from-to) | 135-152 |
Number of pages | 18 |
ISSN | 0106-4525 |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2017 |