Do External Evaluations Improve Programs ?

Research output: Working paperResearch

60 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The author draws on previous research on evaluation use to identify and analyse what is already known about how evaluations might change the working of and consequently, the performance of the evaluated programs. It is concluded that despite abundant knowledge about evaluation use, theoretical and empirical, there is limited conceptual knowledge and next to no empirical evidence for when and how evaluations actually produce real improvements to the results delivered by evaluated programs (called ‘consequences of use’ in the paper).
Original languageEnglish
Pages1-19
Number of pages19
Publication statusUnpublished - 2016

Cite this

@techreport{241bc7f3c73749b7a82e615a39ff1e9e,
title = "Do External Evaluations Improve Programs ?",
abstract = "The author draws on previous research on evaluation use to identify and analyse what is already known about how evaluations might change the working of and consequently, the performance of the evaluated programs. It is concluded that despite abundant knowledge about evaluation use, theoretical and empirical, there is limited conceptual knowledge and next to no empirical evidence for when and how evaluations actually produce real improvements to the results delivered by evaluated programs (called ‘consequences of use’ in the paper).",
author = "Madsen, {Poul Th{\o}is}",
note = "Der er tale om et papir, der er udgivet p{\aa} dansk, men som efter at have v{\ae}ret submittet til tre centrale evalueringstidsskrifter er blevet opgivet. Hvis man skal videre med det, skal der foretages selvst{\ae}ndige empiriske studier af, hvordan evalueringer {\ae}ndringer p{\aa} praksis. Det er blevet revideret to gange af samme grund, men ikke en tredje. I den forstand er det peer reviewet. Hovedkritikken af artiklen er, at der ikke er tilstr{\ae}kkelig bel{\ae}g for hovedp{\aa}standen, at vi for lidt om, hvad der kommer ud af at evaluere. Der er imidlertid pointer i artikler - is{\ae}r hvad ang{\aa}r begrebsdannelsen, der giver det meningen at give adgang til det her. Det er ogs{\aa} vigtigt, at vi ser det, som ikke udgives, der jo ogs{\aa} er arbejde - i det her tilf{\ae}lde et stort af slagsen.",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
pages = "1--19",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

Do External Evaluations Improve Programs ? / Madsen, Poul Thøis.

2016. p. 1-19.

Research output: Working paperResearch

TY - UNPB

T1 - Do External Evaluations Improve Programs ?

AU - Madsen, Poul Thøis

N1 - Der er tale om et papir, der er udgivet på dansk, men som efter at have været submittet til tre centrale evalueringstidsskrifter er blevet opgivet. Hvis man skal videre med det, skal der foretages selvstændige empiriske studier af, hvordan evalueringer ændringer på praksis. Det er blevet revideret to gange af samme grund, men ikke en tredje. I den forstand er det peer reviewet. Hovedkritikken af artiklen er, at der ikke er tilstrækkelig belæg for hovedpåstanden, at vi for lidt om, hvad der kommer ud af at evaluere. Der er imidlertid pointer i artikler - især hvad angår begrebsdannelsen, der giver det meningen at give adgang til det her. Det er også vigtigt, at vi ser det, som ikke udgives, der jo også er arbejde - i det her tilfælde et stort af slagsen.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The author draws on previous research on evaluation use to identify and analyse what is already known about how evaluations might change the working of and consequently, the performance of the evaluated programs. It is concluded that despite abundant knowledge about evaluation use, theoretical and empirical, there is limited conceptual knowledge and next to no empirical evidence for when and how evaluations actually produce real improvements to the results delivered by evaluated programs (called ‘consequences of use’ in the paper).

AB - The author draws on previous research on evaluation use to identify and analyse what is already known about how evaluations might change the working of and consequently, the performance of the evaluated programs. It is concluded that despite abundant knowledge about evaluation use, theoretical and empirical, there is limited conceptual knowledge and next to no empirical evidence for when and how evaluations actually produce real improvements to the results delivered by evaluated programs (called ‘consequences of use’ in the paper).

M3 - Working paper

SP - 1

EP - 19

BT - Do External Evaluations Improve Programs ?

ER -