“Do they understand”? A case study of atypical institutional encounters

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Individuals with impairments face challenges in their seeking to accomplish communicational goals. Despite continuous efforts to communicate, often they appear disregarded. A critical discussion of mutual understanding provides a basis for an investigation of institutional encounters. Video ethnography and field work were carried out in a residential care facility involving an individual with acquired brain injury and professionals. In revisiting the concept of ‘communicational understanding’, an analysis of the individual's efforts to communicate and the professionals' apparent disregard showed discrepancies. This research focused on a perceived lack of ‘communicational care’ in turning the spotlight towards the individual and mutual understanding.
Original languageEnglish
JournalLanguage & Communication
Volume86
Pages (from-to)70-79
Number of pages10
ISSN0271-5309
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Sep 2022

Keywords

  • Mutual understanding
  • Fælles forståelse
  • Professional practice
  • Health communication
  • Acquired Brain Injury
  • Senhjerneskade
  • Institutional encounters
  • Atypical interaction
  • Integrationism
  • Integrational linguistics
  • Language psychology
  • Institutional ethnography
  • Harris
  • Taylor
  • Robillard
  • Interpretive asymmetry
  • Impairment
  • ICF
  • UN
  • WHO

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“Do they understand”? A case study of atypical institutional encounters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this