Does the visibility of destination matter more than distance in human navigation? A pilot virtual reality study

Zakaria Djebbara*, Mille Boye Nielsen, Christina Lomholt, Tsila Yaloz, Cecilie Marie Busk, Maibritt Dammann

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Navigational decisions depend on both cognitive maps and immediate sensory experiences of the environment. However, when both cognitive maps and immediate sensory experiences are uncertain, it is unclear how decisions are made. Here, we question whether visibility of the destination matters more than the distance to that destination as constructed by our cognitive map [Tolman, E. C. 1948. “Cognitive Maps in Rats and men.” Psychological Review 55 (4): 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061626]. We used Virtual Reality to create an embodied navigation task in a uniform environment, where we varied visibility and distance. Participants located two spheres in the environment and were then instructed to find one of them in a subsequent trial. Participants’ choices and movement were analysed. We find that participants base their navigational decisions on distance rather than visibility, favouring shorter distances over visibility. We find that cognitive maps surpass visual appearance, and embodied interactions are crucial for navigation.

Original languageEnglish
JournalArchitectural Science Review
Number of pages10
ISSN0003-8628
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 11 Mar 2025

Keywords

  • Navigation
  • architecture
  • embodied cognition
  • isovist
  • landmarks
  • neuroarchitecture
  • space syntax
  • wayfinding

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does the visibility of destination matter more than distance in human navigation? A pilot virtual reality study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this