Economic feasibility of maximising daylighting of a standard office building with efficient electric lighting

Marc Fontoynont, Karine Ramananarivo , Thierry Soreze, Gerald Fernez , Karen Guldhammer Skov

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper investigates the cost of developing various daylighting strategies for a standard office building in relation to their ability to reduce electric lighting consumption. The reference building design for this study corresponds to a typical configuration that minimises the construction costs and is typical of the French market. We have compared scenarios that entail moving service spaces to the periphery, increasing ceiling height and adding light wells of various shapes. These special features increased the proportion of the indoor area with sufficient daylight by up to 40%, with an increase of construction costs ranging between 1.3% and 15.5% of the cost of the building. The extra cost of adding light wells was estimated at an average of €344 per work place, or €34 m−2 for a standard building with a distance between facades of 18 m. This value has to be compared with typical construction costs of €1500 m−2. Payback time on investment based only on savings on lighting electricity appeared to be far too long (from 41 years to 540 years depending on the configuration tested) for this alone to justify the investment. However, benefits should be assessed in relation to the occupants’ well-being, safety in case of an electrical black-out, and rental and resell value.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEnergy and Buildings
Volume110
Issue number1 January
Pages (from-to)435-442
Number of pages8
ISSN0378-7788
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2016

Cite this

Fontoynont, Marc ; Ramananarivo , Karine ; Soreze, Thierry ; Fernez , Gerald ; Skov, Karen Guldhammer. / Economic feasibility of maximising daylighting of a standard office building with efficient electric lighting. In: Energy and Buildings. 2016 ; Vol. 110, No. 1 January. pp. 435-442.
@article{485b16ba49bf43179486fd0fa7376c95,
title = "Economic feasibility of maximising daylighting of a standard office building with efficient electric lighting",
abstract = "This paper investigates the cost of developing various daylighting strategies for a standard office building in relation to their ability to reduce electric lighting consumption. The reference building design for this study corresponds to a typical configuration that minimises the construction costs and is typical of the French market. We have compared scenarios that entail moving service spaces to the periphery, increasing ceiling height and adding light wells of various shapes. These special features increased the proportion of the indoor area with sufficient daylight by up to 40{\%}, with an increase of construction costs ranging between 1.3{\%} and 15.5{\%} of the cost of the building. The extra cost of adding light wells was estimated at an average of €344 per work place, or €34 m−2 for a standard building with a distance between facades of 18 m. This value has to be compared with typical construction costs of €1500 m−2. Payback time on investment based only on savings on lighting electricity appeared to be far too long (from 41 years to 540 years depending on the configuration tested) for this alone to justify the investment. However, benefits should be assessed in relation to the occupants’ well-being, safety in case of an electrical black-out, and rental and resell value.",
author = "Marc Fontoynont and Karine Ramananarivo and Thierry Soreze and Gerald Fernez and Skov, {Karen Guldhammer}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.09.045",
language = "English",
volume = "110",
pages = "435--442",
journal = "Energy and Buildings",
issn = "0378-7788",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1 January",

}

Economic feasibility of maximising daylighting of a standard office building with efficient electric lighting. / Fontoynont, Marc; Ramananarivo , Karine ; Soreze, Thierry ; Fernez , Gerald ; Skov, Karen Guldhammer.

In: Energy and Buildings, Vol. 110, No. 1 January, 01.01.2016, p. 435-442.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Economic feasibility of maximising daylighting of a standard office building with efficient electric lighting

AU - Fontoynont, Marc

AU - Ramananarivo , Karine

AU - Soreze, Thierry

AU - Fernez , Gerald

AU - Skov, Karen Guldhammer

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - This paper investigates the cost of developing various daylighting strategies for a standard office building in relation to their ability to reduce electric lighting consumption. The reference building design for this study corresponds to a typical configuration that minimises the construction costs and is typical of the French market. We have compared scenarios that entail moving service spaces to the periphery, increasing ceiling height and adding light wells of various shapes. These special features increased the proportion of the indoor area with sufficient daylight by up to 40%, with an increase of construction costs ranging between 1.3% and 15.5% of the cost of the building. The extra cost of adding light wells was estimated at an average of €344 per work place, or €34 m−2 for a standard building with a distance between facades of 18 m. This value has to be compared with typical construction costs of €1500 m−2. Payback time on investment based only on savings on lighting electricity appeared to be far too long (from 41 years to 540 years depending on the configuration tested) for this alone to justify the investment. However, benefits should be assessed in relation to the occupants’ well-being, safety in case of an electrical black-out, and rental and resell value.

AB - This paper investigates the cost of developing various daylighting strategies for a standard office building in relation to their ability to reduce electric lighting consumption. The reference building design for this study corresponds to a typical configuration that minimises the construction costs and is typical of the French market. We have compared scenarios that entail moving service spaces to the periphery, increasing ceiling height and adding light wells of various shapes. These special features increased the proportion of the indoor area with sufficient daylight by up to 40%, with an increase of construction costs ranging between 1.3% and 15.5% of the cost of the building. The extra cost of adding light wells was estimated at an average of €344 per work place, or €34 m−2 for a standard building with a distance between facades of 18 m. This value has to be compared with typical construction costs of €1500 m−2. Payback time on investment based only on savings on lighting electricity appeared to be far too long (from 41 years to 540 years depending on the configuration tested) for this alone to justify the investment. However, benefits should be assessed in relation to the occupants’ well-being, safety in case of an electrical black-out, and rental and resell value.

UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778815302851

U2 - 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.09.045

DO - 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.09.045

M3 - Journal article

VL - 110

SP - 435

EP - 442

JO - Energy and Buildings

JF - Energy and Buildings

SN - 0378-7788

IS - 1 January

ER -