Education governance and standardised tests in Denmark and England

Peter Kelly, Karen Egedal Andreasen, Kristine Kousholt, Elisabeth McNess, Christian Ydesen

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
42 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this study we identify and compare the impact of standardised student assessment in England, an established neoliberal context, and in Denmark where a neoliberal education reform agenda is emerging in response to both national concerns and international governance. National reading tests for students aged 11–12 years, long established in England, were introduced in Denmark in 2010.
The form they take differs considerably, being primarily formative in Denmark and largely summative in England. Culturally sensitive extended semi-structured interviews are conducted with both teachers and students and analysed to identify the extent to which neoliberal reform is mobilised through testing in each context and how testing shapes curriculum and pedagogy. Significantly, we find that in Denmark, where professional judgement still dominates, teachers often deploy pedagogical approaches to service what they believe to be their students’ best interests. In England, however, teachers try to accommodate a concern for both their students’ and their own interests, and the pedagogy they enact is more often controlling, instrumental and reductionist; their wish to be proactive is compromised by their need to be responsive. Hence we show
how policy technologies shape practice to undermine a deliberate pedagogy rooted in ideas legitimated though scholarship and experience.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Education Policy
Volume33
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)739-758
Number of pages20
ISSN0268-0939
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Denmark
governance
education
student
teacher
reform
curriculum
interview
experience

Keywords

  • Testpractice
  • England
  • Denmark
  • governance
  • School
  • reading tests
  • sociology
  • national standardised testing
  • policy technologies
  • Comparative
  • global and national educational governance

Cite this

Kelly, Peter ; Andreasen, Karen Egedal ; Kousholt, Kristine ; McNess, Elisabeth ; Ydesen, Christian. / Education governance and standardised tests in Denmark and England. In: Journal of Education Policy. 2018 ; Vol. 33, No. 6. pp. 739-758.
@article{92d798468bb4474db0fc933a47b3e996,
title = "Education governance and standardised tests in Denmark and England",
abstract = "In this study we identify and compare the impact of standardised student assessment in England, an established neoliberal context, and in Denmark where a neoliberal education reform agenda is emerging in response to both national concerns and international governance. National reading tests for students aged 11–12 years, long established in England, were introduced in Denmark in 2010.The form they take differs considerably, being primarily formative in Denmark and largely summative in England. Culturally sensitive extended semi-structured interviews are conducted with both teachers and students and analysed to identify the extent to which neoliberal reform is mobilised through testing in each context and how testing shapes curriculum and pedagogy. Significantly, we find that in Denmark, where professional judgement still dominates, teachers often deploy pedagogical approaches to service what they believe to be their students’ best interests. In England, however, teachers try to accommodate a concern for both their students’ and their own interests, and the pedagogy they enact is more often controlling, instrumental and reductionist; their wish to be proactive is compromised by their need to be responsive. Hence we showhow policy technologies shape practice to undermine a deliberate pedagogy rooted in ideas legitimated though scholarship and experience.",
keywords = "Assessment, Test, Comparative Education, Denmark, England, Testpractice, England, Denmark, governance, School, reading tests, sociology, national standardised testing, policy technologies, Comparative, global and national educational governance",
author = "Peter Kelly and Andreasen, {Karen Egedal} and Kristine Kousholt and Elisabeth McNess and Christian Ydesen",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/02680939.2017.1360518",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "739--758",
journal = "Journal of Education Policy",
issn = "0268-0939",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

Education governance and standardised tests in Denmark and England. / Kelly, Peter; Andreasen, Karen Egedal; Kousholt, Kristine; McNess, Elisabeth; Ydesen, Christian.

In: Journal of Education Policy, Vol. 33, No. 6, 2018, p. 739-758.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Education governance and standardised tests in Denmark and England

AU - Kelly, Peter

AU - Andreasen, Karen Egedal

AU - Kousholt, Kristine

AU - McNess, Elisabeth

AU - Ydesen, Christian

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - In this study we identify and compare the impact of standardised student assessment in England, an established neoliberal context, and in Denmark where a neoliberal education reform agenda is emerging in response to both national concerns and international governance. National reading tests for students aged 11–12 years, long established in England, were introduced in Denmark in 2010.The form they take differs considerably, being primarily formative in Denmark and largely summative in England. Culturally sensitive extended semi-structured interviews are conducted with both teachers and students and analysed to identify the extent to which neoliberal reform is mobilised through testing in each context and how testing shapes curriculum and pedagogy. Significantly, we find that in Denmark, where professional judgement still dominates, teachers often deploy pedagogical approaches to service what they believe to be their students’ best interests. In England, however, teachers try to accommodate a concern for both their students’ and their own interests, and the pedagogy they enact is more often controlling, instrumental and reductionist; their wish to be proactive is compromised by their need to be responsive. Hence we showhow policy technologies shape practice to undermine a deliberate pedagogy rooted in ideas legitimated though scholarship and experience.

AB - In this study we identify and compare the impact of standardised student assessment in England, an established neoliberal context, and in Denmark where a neoliberal education reform agenda is emerging in response to both national concerns and international governance. National reading tests for students aged 11–12 years, long established in England, were introduced in Denmark in 2010.The form they take differs considerably, being primarily formative in Denmark and largely summative in England. Culturally sensitive extended semi-structured interviews are conducted with both teachers and students and analysed to identify the extent to which neoliberal reform is mobilised through testing in each context and how testing shapes curriculum and pedagogy. Significantly, we find that in Denmark, where professional judgement still dominates, teachers often deploy pedagogical approaches to service what they believe to be their students’ best interests. In England, however, teachers try to accommodate a concern for both their students’ and their own interests, and the pedagogy they enact is more often controlling, instrumental and reductionist; their wish to be proactive is compromised by their need to be responsive. Hence we showhow policy technologies shape practice to undermine a deliberate pedagogy rooted in ideas legitimated though scholarship and experience.

KW - Assessment

KW - Test

KW - Comparative Education

KW - Denmark

KW - England

KW - Testpractice

KW - England

KW - Denmark

KW - governance

KW - School

KW - reading tests

KW - sociology

KW - national standardised testing

KW - policy technologies

KW - Comparative

KW - global and national educational governance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027895453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02680939.2017.1360518

DO - 10.1080/02680939.2017.1360518

M3 - Journal article

VL - 33

SP - 739

EP - 758

JO - Journal of Education Policy

JF - Journal of Education Policy

SN - 0268-0939

IS - 6

ER -