Evaluations of the technical changes and social interactions that occurred during the participatory process, and summarizing on improved scientific skills. Jakfish Deliverable 6.1

Christine Röckmann, Clara Ulrich, Marion Dreyer, Ewen Bell, Edward Borodzicz, Päivi Elisabet Haapasaari, Kjellrun Hiis Hauge, Daniel Howell, Samu Mäntyniemi, David Miller, George Tserpes, Martin Pastoors

Research output: Book/ReportReportResearch

Abstract

How can uncertain fisheries science be linked with good governance processes, thereby increasing fisheries management legitimacy and effectiveness? Reducing the uncertainties around scientific models has long been perceived as the cure of the fisheries management problem. There is however increasing recognition that uncertainty in the numbers will remain. A lack of transparency with respect to these uncertainties can damage the credibility of science. The EU Commission’s proposal for a reformed Common Fisheries Policy calls for more self-management for the fishing industry by increasing fishers’ involvement in the planning and execution of policies and boosting the role of fishers’ organisations. One way of higher transparency and improved participation is to include stakeholders in the modelling process itself. The JAKFISH project (Judgment And Knowledge in Fisheries Involving StakeHolders) invited fisheries stakeholders to participate in the process of framing the management problem, and to give input and evaluate the scientific models that are used to provide fisheries management advice. JAKFISH investigated various tools to assess and communicate uncertainty around fish stock assessments and fisheries management. Here, a synthesis is presented of the participatory work carried out in four European fishery case studies (Western Baltic herring, North Sea Nephrops, Central Baltic Herring and Mediterranean swordfish), focussing on the uncertainty tools used, the stakeholders’ responses to these, and the lessons learnt. We conclude that participatory modelling has the potential to facilitate and structure discussions between scientists and stakeholders about uncertainties and the quality of the knowledge base. It can also contribute to collective learning, increase legitimacy, and advance scientific understanding. However, when approaching real-life situations, modelling should not be seen as the priority objective. Rather, the crucial step in a sciencestakeholder collaboration is the joint problem framing in an open, transparent way.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherJudgment and Knowledge in Fisheries Involving Stakeholders - Jakfish- project co-funded by the EC within the 7th Framework Programme
Number of pages31
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2011

Fingerprint

stakeholder
fishery management
fishery
transparency
Common Fisheries Policy
modeling
fishery science
fishing industry
stock assessment
learning
evaluation
damage

Cite this

Röckmann, C., Ulrich, C., Dreyer, M., Bell, E., Borodzicz, E., Haapasaari, P. E., ... Pastoors, M. (2011). Evaluations of the technical changes and social interactions that occurred during the participatory process, and summarizing on improved scientific skills. Jakfish Deliverable 6.1. Judgment and Knowledge in Fisheries Involving Stakeholders - Jakfish- project co-funded by the EC within the 7th Framework Programme.
Röckmann, Christine ; Ulrich, Clara ; Dreyer, Marion ; Bell, Ewen ; Borodzicz, Edward ; Haapasaari, Päivi Elisabet ; Hiis Hauge, Kjellrun ; Howell, Daniel ; Mäntyniemi, Samu ; Miller, David ; Tserpes, George ; Pastoors, Martin. / Evaluations of the technical changes and social interactions that occurred during the participatory process, and summarizing on improved scientific skills. Jakfish Deliverable 6.1. Judgment and Knowledge in Fisheries Involving Stakeholders - Jakfish- project co-funded by the EC within the 7th Framework Programme, 2011. 31 p.
@book{8fb1b5f048214e6a836cf893c3240a96,
title = "Evaluations of the technical changes and social interactions that occurred during the participatory process, and summarizing on improved scientific skills. Jakfish Deliverable 6.1",
abstract = "How can uncertain fisheries science be linked with good governance processes, thereby increasing fisheries management legitimacy and effectiveness? Reducing the uncertainties around scientific models has long been perceived as the cure of the fisheries management problem. There is however increasing recognition that uncertainty in the numbers will remain. A lack of transparency with respect to these uncertainties can damage the credibility of science. The EU Commission’s proposal for a reformed Common Fisheries Policy calls for more self-management for the fishing industry by increasing fishers’ involvement in the planning and execution of policies and boosting the role of fishers’ organisations. One way of higher transparency and improved participation is to include stakeholders in the modelling process itself. The JAKFISH project (Judgment And Knowledge in Fisheries Involving StakeHolders) invited fisheries stakeholders to participate in the process of framing the management problem, and to give input and evaluate the scientific models that are used to provide fisheries management advice. JAKFISH investigated various tools to assess and communicate uncertainty around fish stock assessments and fisheries management. Here, a synthesis is presented of the participatory work carried out in four European fishery case studies (Western Baltic herring, North Sea Nephrops, Central Baltic Herring and Mediterranean swordfish), focussing on the uncertainty tools used, the stakeholders’ responses to these, and the lessons learnt. We conclude that participatory modelling has the potential to facilitate and structure discussions between scientists and stakeholders about uncertainties and the quality of the knowledge base. It can also contribute to collective learning, increase legitimacy, and advance scientific understanding. However, when approaching real-life situations, modelling should not be seen as the priority objective. Rather, the crucial step in a sciencestakeholder collaboration is the joint problem framing in an open, transparent way.",
author = "Christine R{\"o}ckmann and Clara Ulrich and Marion Dreyer and Ewen Bell and Edward Borodzicz and Haapasaari, {P{\"a}ivi Elisabet} and {Hiis Hauge}, Kjellrun and Daniel Howell and Samu M{\"a}ntyniemi and David Miller and George Tserpes and Martin Pastoors",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
language = "English",
publisher = "Judgment and Knowledge in Fisheries Involving Stakeholders - Jakfish- project co-funded by the EC within the 7th Framework Programme",

}

Röckmann, C, Ulrich, C, Dreyer, M, Bell, E, Borodzicz, E, Haapasaari, PE, Hiis Hauge, K, Howell, D, Mäntyniemi, S, Miller, D, Tserpes, G & Pastoors, M 2011, Evaluations of the technical changes and social interactions that occurred during the participatory process, and summarizing on improved scientific skills. Jakfish Deliverable 6.1. Judgment and Knowledge in Fisheries Involving Stakeholders - Jakfish- project co-funded by the EC within the 7th Framework Programme.

Evaluations of the technical changes and social interactions that occurred during the participatory process, and summarizing on improved scientific skills. Jakfish Deliverable 6.1. / Röckmann, Christine; Ulrich, Clara; Dreyer, Marion; Bell, Ewen ; Borodzicz, Edward; Haapasaari, Päivi Elisabet; Hiis Hauge, Kjellrun; Howell, Daniel; Mäntyniemi, Samu; Miller, David; Tserpes, George; Pastoors, Martin.

Judgment and Knowledge in Fisheries Involving Stakeholders - Jakfish- project co-funded by the EC within the 7th Framework Programme, 2011. 31 p.

Research output: Book/ReportReportResearch

TY - RPRT

T1 - Evaluations of the technical changes and social interactions that occurred during the participatory process, and summarizing on improved scientific skills. Jakfish Deliverable 6.1

AU - Röckmann, Christine

AU - Ulrich, Clara

AU - Dreyer, Marion

AU - Bell, Ewen

AU - Borodzicz, Edward

AU - Haapasaari, Päivi Elisabet

AU - Hiis Hauge, Kjellrun

AU - Howell, Daniel

AU - Mäntyniemi, Samu

AU - Miller, David

AU - Tserpes, George

AU - Pastoors, Martin

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - How can uncertain fisheries science be linked with good governance processes, thereby increasing fisheries management legitimacy and effectiveness? Reducing the uncertainties around scientific models has long been perceived as the cure of the fisheries management problem. There is however increasing recognition that uncertainty in the numbers will remain. A lack of transparency with respect to these uncertainties can damage the credibility of science. The EU Commission’s proposal for a reformed Common Fisheries Policy calls for more self-management for the fishing industry by increasing fishers’ involvement in the planning and execution of policies and boosting the role of fishers’ organisations. One way of higher transparency and improved participation is to include stakeholders in the modelling process itself. The JAKFISH project (Judgment And Knowledge in Fisheries Involving StakeHolders) invited fisheries stakeholders to participate in the process of framing the management problem, and to give input and evaluate the scientific models that are used to provide fisheries management advice. JAKFISH investigated various tools to assess and communicate uncertainty around fish stock assessments and fisheries management. Here, a synthesis is presented of the participatory work carried out in four European fishery case studies (Western Baltic herring, North Sea Nephrops, Central Baltic Herring and Mediterranean swordfish), focussing on the uncertainty tools used, the stakeholders’ responses to these, and the lessons learnt. We conclude that participatory modelling has the potential to facilitate and structure discussions between scientists and stakeholders about uncertainties and the quality of the knowledge base. It can also contribute to collective learning, increase legitimacy, and advance scientific understanding. However, when approaching real-life situations, modelling should not be seen as the priority objective. Rather, the crucial step in a sciencestakeholder collaboration is the joint problem framing in an open, transparent way.

AB - How can uncertain fisheries science be linked with good governance processes, thereby increasing fisheries management legitimacy and effectiveness? Reducing the uncertainties around scientific models has long been perceived as the cure of the fisheries management problem. There is however increasing recognition that uncertainty in the numbers will remain. A lack of transparency with respect to these uncertainties can damage the credibility of science. The EU Commission’s proposal for a reformed Common Fisheries Policy calls for more self-management for the fishing industry by increasing fishers’ involvement in the planning and execution of policies and boosting the role of fishers’ organisations. One way of higher transparency and improved participation is to include stakeholders in the modelling process itself. The JAKFISH project (Judgment And Knowledge in Fisheries Involving StakeHolders) invited fisheries stakeholders to participate in the process of framing the management problem, and to give input and evaluate the scientific models that are used to provide fisheries management advice. JAKFISH investigated various tools to assess and communicate uncertainty around fish stock assessments and fisheries management. Here, a synthesis is presented of the participatory work carried out in four European fishery case studies (Western Baltic herring, North Sea Nephrops, Central Baltic Herring and Mediterranean swordfish), focussing on the uncertainty tools used, the stakeholders’ responses to these, and the lessons learnt. We conclude that participatory modelling has the potential to facilitate and structure discussions between scientists and stakeholders about uncertainties and the quality of the knowledge base. It can also contribute to collective learning, increase legitimacy, and advance scientific understanding. However, when approaching real-life situations, modelling should not be seen as the priority objective. Rather, the crucial step in a sciencestakeholder collaboration is the joint problem framing in an open, transparent way.

M3 - Report

BT - Evaluations of the technical changes and social interactions that occurred during the participatory process, and summarizing on improved scientific skills. Jakfish Deliverable 6.1

PB - Judgment and Knowledge in Fisheries Involving Stakeholders - Jakfish- project co-funded by the EC within the 7th Framework Programme

ER -

Röckmann C, Ulrich C, Dreyer M, Bell E, Borodzicz E, Haapasaari PE et al. Evaluations of the technical changes and social interactions that occurred during the participatory process, and summarizing on improved scientific skills. Jakfish Deliverable 6.1. Judgment and Knowledge in Fisheries Involving Stakeholders - Jakfish- project co-funded by the EC within the 7th Framework Programme, 2011. 31 p.