Abstract
User influence, together with propagation environments
and antenna designs, determines how well MIMO terminals
operate in true usage conditions. In this paper, we investigate
to what extent the user influence affects the performance of
a realistic MIMO terminal under various reproduced spatial
channel models in a practical 3D multi-probe anechoic chamber
(MPAC) setup. A terminal mock-up, operating at 2.55 GHz,
together with a realistic user phantom was used, and channel
models with different spatial and polarization profiles, DUT with
different operation modes and orientation angles were tested.
and antenna designs, determines how well MIMO terminals
operate in true usage conditions. In this paper, we investigate
to what extent the user influence affects the performance of
a realistic MIMO terminal under various reproduced spatial
channel models in a practical 3D multi-probe anechoic chamber
(MPAC) setup. A terminal mock-up, operating at 2.55 GHz,
together with a realistic user phantom was used, and channel
models with different spatial and polarization profiles, DUT with
different operation modes and orientation angles were tested.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | I E E E Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters |
Volume | 16 |
Pages (from-to) | 3030 - 3033 |
ISSN | 1536-1225 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2017 |