Experiments with a data public

Moving digital methods into criticical proximity with political practice

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Making publics visible through digital traces has recently generated interest by practitioners of public engagement and scholars within the field of digital methods. This paper presents an experiment in moving such methods into critical proximity with political practice and discusses how digital visualizations of topical debates become appropriated by actors and hardwired into existing ecologies of publics and politics. Through an experiment in rendering a specific data-public visible, it shows how the interplay between diverse conceptions of the public as well as the specific platforms and data invoked, resulted in a situated affordance-space that allowed specific renderings take shape, while disadvantaging others. Furthermore, it argues that several accepted tropes in the literatures of digital methods ended up being problematic guidelines in this space. Among these is the prescription to shown heterogeneity by pushing back at established media logics.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBig Data & Society
Volume6
Issue number1
ISSN2053-9517
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

experiment
visualization
ecology
medication
politics
literature

Cite this

@article{5991a6ae1045495cb956347e5995eedb,
title = "Experiments with a data public: Moving digital methods into criticical proximity with political practice",
abstract = "Making publics visible through digital traces has recently generated interest by practitioners of public engagement and scholars within the field of digital methods. This paper presents an experiment in moving such methods into critical proximity with political practice and discusses how digital visualizations of topical debates become appropriated by actors and hardwired into existing ecologies of publics and politics. Through an experiment in rendering a specific data-public visible, it shows how the interplay between diverse conceptions of the public as well as the specific platforms and data invoked, resulted in a situated affordance-space that allowed specific renderings take shape, while disadvantaging others. Furthermore, it argues that several accepted tropes in the literatures of digital methods ended up being problematic guidelines in this space. Among these is the prescription to shown heterogeneity by pushing back at established media logics.",
author = "Madsen, {Anders Koed} and Munk, {Anders Kristian}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1177/2053951718825357",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
journal = "Big Data & Society",
issn = "2053-9517",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

Experiments with a data public : Moving digital methods into criticical proximity with political practice. / Madsen, Anders Koed; Munk, Anders Kristian.

In: Big Data & Society, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experiments with a data public

T2 - Moving digital methods into criticical proximity with political practice

AU - Madsen, Anders Koed

AU - Munk, Anders Kristian

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Making publics visible through digital traces has recently generated interest by practitioners of public engagement and scholars within the field of digital methods. This paper presents an experiment in moving such methods into critical proximity with political practice and discusses how digital visualizations of topical debates become appropriated by actors and hardwired into existing ecologies of publics and politics. Through an experiment in rendering a specific data-public visible, it shows how the interplay between diverse conceptions of the public as well as the specific platforms and data invoked, resulted in a situated affordance-space that allowed specific renderings take shape, while disadvantaging others. Furthermore, it argues that several accepted tropes in the literatures of digital methods ended up being problematic guidelines in this space. Among these is the prescription to shown heterogeneity by pushing back at established media logics.

AB - Making publics visible through digital traces has recently generated interest by practitioners of public engagement and scholars within the field of digital methods. This paper presents an experiment in moving such methods into critical proximity with political practice and discusses how digital visualizations of topical debates become appropriated by actors and hardwired into existing ecologies of publics and politics. Through an experiment in rendering a specific data-public visible, it shows how the interplay between diverse conceptions of the public as well as the specific platforms and data invoked, resulted in a situated affordance-space that allowed specific renderings take shape, while disadvantaging others. Furthermore, it argues that several accepted tropes in the literatures of digital methods ended up being problematic guidelines in this space. Among these is the prescription to shown heterogeneity by pushing back at established media logics.

U2 - 10.1177/2053951718825357

DO - 10.1177/2053951718825357

M3 - Journal article

VL - 6

JO - Big Data & Society

JF - Big Data & Society

SN - 2053-9517

IS - 1

ER -