Freedom of Expression in the Era of the Privatization of Reason

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    The importance of free speech is beyond dispute in liberal democracy, and is today hardly challenged by anyone, but fundamentalist, religious groups. But which purpose should free speech serve, and how should it be (re)defined and administered in order to fulfill this purpose? I claim that these questions are more important than they may seem, and that they are easily overlooked, if free speech is treated as an end in itself or as something that one should not question at all. In the liberal tradition, freedom of expression was clearly valued for its excellent utility for the progress of society, but not for being an end in itself. In this article, I want, first, to make this point clear (through a reading of John Stuart Mill and Immanuel Kant) and, second, to offer a couple of suggestions for relevant discussions on the restrictions, regulations and reinventions of free speech that might be required today in order to sustain and revive the liberal tradition itself.
    Translated title of the contributionYtringsfrihed i tidsalderen for privatisering af fornuften
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalAkademisk kvarter / Academic Quarter
    Volume14
    Pages (from-to)12-24
    Number of pages13
    ISSN1904-0008
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Freedom of Expression in the Era of the Privatization of Reason'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this