Projects per year
Abstract
This paper deals with the governance of a particular common good in the Danish
construction industry popularly referred to as ‘the technical knowledge commons.' The technical knowledge commons encompass the sum of practical experiences, professional literature, techniques and tested routines in different technical areas that professionals are expected to be familiar with. Due to its role in institutionalizing conceptions of proper conduct and professional practice, the technical knowledge commons have been met by industry criticism, being seen as ‘backdoor’ regulation that stifles innovation and constitutes a barrier to the globalization of labour and building materials. We illustrate how the technical knowledge commons is singled out as a battleground for struggles to redefine the governance of the industry. Using the concepts of institutional interlocks and meta-routines, it is analysed how actors are connected to the knowledge commons and contribute to a distributed maintenance of contested institutionalized practices. On this basis, we discuss how existing interlocks have been challenged and lost legitimacy in the face of the industry's deregulation and globalization, and how a new form of collective agency has arisen as professional associations have rallied in an attempt to establish new and legitimate governance structures to maintain the common good.
construction industry popularly referred to as ‘the technical knowledge commons.' The technical knowledge commons encompass the sum of practical experiences, professional literature, techniques and tested routines in different technical areas that professionals are expected to be familiar with. Due to its role in institutionalizing conceptions of proper conduct and professional practice, the technical knowledge commons have been met by industry criticism, being seen as ‘backdoor’ regulation that stifles innovation and constitutes a barrier to the globalization of labour and building materials. We illustrate how the technical knowledge commons is singled out as a battleground for struggles to redefine the governance of the industry. Using the concepts of institutional interlocks and meta-routines, it is analysed how actors are connected to the knowledge commons and contribute to a distributed maintenance of contested institutionalized practices. On this basis, we discuss how existing interlocks have been challenged and lost legitimacy in the face of the industry's deregulation and globalization, and how a new form of collective agency has arisen as professional associations have rallied in an attempt to establish new and legitimate governance structures to maintain the common good.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 36th Annual ARCOM Conference |
Editors | Lloyd Scott, Chris Neilson |
Number of pages | 10 |
Publication date | 2020 |
Pages | 225-234 |
Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Event | 36th Annual ARCOM Conference - Online Duration: 7 Sep 2020 → 9 Sep 2020 |
Conference
Conference | 36th Annual ARCOM Conference |
---|---|
Location | Online |
Period | 07/09/2020 → 09/09/2020 |
Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Governing the common good: Collective action in institutional maintenance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Projects
- 1 Finished
-
Kortlægning af det almene tekniske fælleseje og retspraksis omkring fortolkning af dette
Gottlieb, S. C. & Vogelius, P.
01/05/2018 → 01/05/2019
Project: Research