How is evidence to be understood in modern coaching psychology?

Ole Michael Spaten, Lillith Olesen Løkken

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The hunt for evidence in modern coaching psychology could be counter-productive, and possibly lead to a simplified approach to research, practice, searching for “definitive truths”. The article discuss a critical approach to evidence hierarchies, and the prevalent (medical) understanding of evidence, and in an overall sense the purpose of evidence in coaching psychological practice. Concepts such as “practice-based evidence” and “experienced evidence” will be argued and put in relation to the classic concept of evidence. Will it be useful to suggest a practitioner’s perspective as a wider concept of evidence applied to psychological practice? Limitations and challenges in relation to this suggestion are pinpointed in the end.
Original languageEnglish
JournalCoaching Psykologi - The Danish Journal of Coaching Psychology
Volume4
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)73-80
ISSN2244-9698
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Dec 2015

Keywords

  • Evidence based practice, hierarchies, coaching, experienced evidence, practice-based evidence, and reflective practice.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How is evidence to be understood in modern coaching psychology?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this