Abstract
Standardised formats in social work have often been seen as neo-liberal and linked to New Public Management. Analysing naturally occurring data from social work interactions (conversations) in a homeless shelter, we argue that examining street-level bureaucracy from a discursive perspective enables us to discover new aspects of form-related interaction. By investigating several approaches to form-talk, we see how standardisation, routinisation, time and documentation function in concert to accomplish social work. We argue that, while some talk strictly adheres to questionnaires, allowing little space for client voice, other types of form-related talk do not adhere directly to form questions, providing more space for client voice. Importantly, the former interactions are discursively narrow spaces for client participation but provide transparency of the accountable event in play, while the latter discussions are more participatory client spaces that reduce transparency of the accountable event. As a result, we are both critical of the use of forms in the casework context and cautiously optimistic in terms of implications for social work.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | British Journal of Social Work |
Volume | 48 |
Issue number | 3 |
Pages (from-to) | 714–733 |
Number of pages | 20 |
ISSN | 0045-3102 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2018 |
Keywords
- Street-level bureaucracy
- conversation analysis
- discourse analysis
- institutional interaction
- neo-liberalism
- social work