Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate supply chain management (SCM) as a management implement from a symbolic perspective on a dyadic level. So far, no research has investigated SCM from such a perspective, although SCM researchers implicitly have noted that it would be useful to have such a study in order to broaden the understanding of the SCM concept, as such a study allows for the use of alternative sociological theories.
Design/methodology/approach – A single case study was chosen in order to investigate a focal firm's use of SCM. A total of 27?hours of interviews and 15?hours of observations were carried out at the focal firm and with a number of the firm's suppliers in order to investigate the subject.
Findings – The paper found that the SCM concept impacts the relationship between buyer and supplier in different ways depending on two dimensions: SCM as tool vs symbol and arm's length relationships vs strategic partnerships. Contrary to the mainstream idea of SCM as a tool for increased effectiveness of supply chains and increased collaboration with key suppliers, this paper found that SCM from a symbolic perspective at the focal firm came to function as either a justification or as a post-rationalization for actions taken by the focal firm depending on whether the relationship can be considered a strategic partnerships or an arm's length relationship, respectively.
Research limitations/implications – The paper was conducted from a dyadic, buyer-supplier perspective. Being a limitation of the study, future research should investigate the proposed claims set forward in this paper on different levels (focal, chain, and network) in order to either strengthen or weaken the credibility of this present paper.
Originality/value – This is the first paper to investigate the management implement of SCM from a symbolic perspective.
Design/methodology/approach – A single case study was chosen in order to investigate a focal firm's use of SCM. A total of 27?hours of interviews and 15?hours of observations were carried out at the focal firm and with a number of the firm's suppliers in order to investigate the subject.
Findings – The paper found that the SCM concept impacts the relationship between buyer and supplier in different ways depending on two dimensions: SCM as tool vs symbol and arm's length relationships vs strategic partnerships. Contrary to the mainstream idea of SCM as a tool for increased effectiveness of supply chains and increased collaboration with key suppliers, this paper found that SCM from a symbolic perspective at the focal firm came to function as either a justification or as a post-rationalization for actions taken by the focal firm depending on whether the relationship can be considered a strategic partnerships or an arm's length relationship, respectively.
Research limitations/implications – The paper was conducted from a dyadic, buyer-supplier perspective. Being a limitation of the study, future research should investigate the proposed claims set forward in this paper on different levels (focal, chain, and network) in order to either strengthen or weaken the credibility of this present paper.
Originality/value – This is the first paper to investigate the management implement of SCM from a symbolic perspective.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Pages (from-to) | 315-331 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| ISSN | 0960-0035 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
| Externally published | Yes |