Implementing patient-reported outcomes in clinical decision-making within knee and hip osteoarthritis: an explorative review

Natasha Lee Sørensen, Lianna Hede Hammeken, Janus Nikolaj Laust Thomsen, Lars Holger Ehlers

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)
89 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: In the past few decades, there has been an increasing focus on the importance of patient involvement in the health care system. Patient participation executed through patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and the integration of such into clinical practice has been framed as positive for patients, care providers, and the health care system as a whole. This review aims to elucidate and discuss the current and future use of PROs in clinical practice and to identify the most common types of PRO measures (PROMs) used for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis in different treatment settings.
Original languageEnglish
Article number230
JournalBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Volume20
Issue number1
Number of pages8
ISSN1471-2474
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 May 2019

Keywords

  • Clinical Decision-Making/methods
  • Humans
  • Osteoarthritis, Hip/therapy
  • Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy
  • Patient Participation
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Treatment Outcome

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Implementing patient-reported outcomes in clinical decision-making within knee and hip osteoarthritis: an explorative review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this