Improved Classification of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Results of 3 Danish Cohorts

Karina Dahl Steffensen, Marianne Waldstrom, Anni Grove, Bente Lund, Niels Pallisgard, Anders Jakobsen

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:: An increasing body of evidence has suggested that epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients can broadly be divided into 2 groups on the basis of histopathologic parameters and molecular profiles. Type 1 tumors are slow-growing tumors with inherent mutations such as KRAS or BRAF mutations, whereas type 2 tumors are more rapidly growing tumors of which many contain TP53 mutations. In the present study, we performed a comprehensive study in a large Danish material to evaluate the clinical importance. MATERIALS AND METHODS:: A total of 512 tissue samples were included (430 EOCs, 34 borderline, 28 benign tumors, and 20 normal ovaries). KRAS mutations (codon 12/13) and BRAF codon 600 mutations were analyzed from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue by ARMS qPCR. p53 expression was examined by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS:: Of the EOC patients, 25% had histopathologically classified type 1 tumors, and of these, 44% were either KRAS or BRAF mutated. Of patients with histopathologic type 2 tumors, 66% showed p53 protein overexpression, whereas 4 (1.5%) patients contained a KRAS mutation. In a univariate survival analysis, a large difference in survival was seen between patients with type 1 and type 2 tumors. Patients with type histologic 2 tumors had significantly worse survival compared with patients with type 1 tumors (P <10). International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, tumor grade, residual tumor, and KRAS/BRAF mutation were independent predictors of overall survival in the multivariate analysis. Patients with KRAS/BRAF mutated carcinomas showed independent decreased overall survival with a hazard ratio of 2.01 (95% confidence interval, 1.13-3.57; P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS:: KRAS/BRAF mutations are with very few exceptions constrained to patients with histopathologic type 1 tumors, whereas p53 overexpression is very frequent in type 2 tumors. KRAS/BRAF mutations had independent prognostic importance. The classification presented here should have a major therapeutic implication and serve as a hallmark of future clinical trials.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Volume21
Pages (from-to)1592-1600
Number of pages9
ISSN1048-891X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Sept 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improved Classification of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Results of 3 Danish Cohorts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this