In the name of democracy: UNSC reform at the intersection of discourse and governmentality

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Both scholars and practitioners are frustrated by the complexity of United Nations Security Council reform. Most research on the reform process is situated within international relations, and almost no attention is granted to the discursive dimensions of the reform. This article approaches democracy promotion as a governmental rationality within the United Nations, and it traces how this governmentality is co-constituted and negotiated discursively in the reform debate. The analysis focuses on argumentation and topoi in statements from debates about reform during 2015 to 2016 by two groups: The Group of Four and The Uniting for Consensus. The analysis demonstrates how the two groups utilise a topos of majority and a topos of equality, respectively, and how the groups thereby in different ways co-constitute and negotiate the governmental rationality of democracy. Through this, the article unravels the subtle ways in which the rigidity of the reform process is co-constituted through discourse.

Original languageEnglish
Article number32(2)
JournalDiscourse & Society
Volume32
Issue number2
ISSN0957-9265
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 5 Nov 2020

Keywords

  • Argumentation
  • United Nations Security Council
  • critical discourse studies
  • democracy
  • global governance
  • governmentality
  • international relations
  • topoi

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'In the name of democracy: UNSC reform at the intersection of discourse and governmentality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this