In Vivo Biokinetics of 177Lu-OPS201 in Mice and Pigs as a Model for Predicting Human Dosimetry

Seval Beykan, Melpomeni Fani, Svend Borup Jensen, Guillaume Nicolas, Damian Wild, Jens Kaufmann, Michael Lassmann

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)
194 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction. 177 Lu-OPS201 is a high-affinity somatostatin receptor subtype 2 antagonist for PRRT in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. The aim is to find the optimal scaling for dosimetry and to compare the biokinetics of 177 Lu-OPS201 in animals and humans. Methods. Data on biokinetics of 177 Lu-OPS201 were analyzed in athymic nude Foxn1 nu mice (28 F, weight: 26 ± 1 g), Danish Landrace pigs (3 F-1 M, weight: 28 ± 2 kg), and patients (3 F-1 M, weight: 61 ± 17 kg) with administered activities of 0.19–0.27 MBq (mice), 97–113 MBq (pigs), and 850–1086 MBq (patients). After euthanizing mice (up to 168 h), the organ-specific activity contents (including blood) were measured. Multiple planar and SPECT/CT scans were performed until 250 h (pigs) and 72 h (patients) to quantify the uptake in the kidneys and liver. Blood samples were taken up to 23 h (patients) and 300 h (pigs). In pigs and patients, kidney protection was applied. Time-dependent uptake data sets were created for each species and organ/tissue. Biexponential fits were applied to compare the biokinetics in the kidneys, liver, and blood of each species. The time-integrated activity coefficients (TIACs) were calculated by using NUKFIT. To determine the optimal scaling, several methods (relative mass scaling, time scaling, combined mass and time scaling, and allometric scaling) were compared. Results. A fast blood clearance of the compound was observed in the first phase (<56 h) for all species. In comparison with patients, pigs showed higher liver retention. Based on the direct comparison of the TIACs, an underestimation in mice (liver and kidneys) and an overestimation in pigs’ kidneys compared to the patient data (kidney TIAC: mice 1.4 h, pigs 7.7 h, and patients 5.8 h; liver TIAC: mice 0.7 h, pigs 4.1 h, and patients 5.3 h) were observed. Most similar TIACs were obtained by applying time scaling (mice) and combined scaling (pigs) (kidney TIAC: mice 3.9 h, pigs 4.8 h, and patients 5.8 h; liver TIAC: mice 0.9 h, pigs 4.7 h, and patients 5.3 h). Conclusion. If the organ mass ratios between the species are high, the combined mass and time scaling method is optimal to minimize the interspecies differences. The analysis of the fit functions and the TIACs shows that pigs are better mimicking human biokinetics.

Original languageEnglish
Article number6438196
JournalContrast Media and Molecular Imaging
Volume2019
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
ISSN1555-4309
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'In Vivo Biokinetics of 177Lu-OPS201 in Mice and Pigs as a Model for Predicting Human Dosimetry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this