In vivo calibration of the T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance method at 1.5 T for estimation of cardiac iron in a minipig model of transfusional iron overload

Peter-Diedrich Matthias Jensen*, Asbjørn Haaning Nielsen, Carsten Wiberg Simonsen, Ulrik Thorngren Baandrup, Svend Eggert Jensen, Martin Bøgsted, Sigriður Olga Magnusdottir, Anne Birthe Helweg Jensen, Benedict Kjærgaard

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
35 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive estimation of the cardiac iron concentration (CIC) by T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has been validated repeatedly and is in widespread clinical use. However, calibration data are limited, and mostly from post-mortem studies. In the present study, we performed an in vivo calibration in a dextran-iron loaded minipig model.

METHODS: R2* (= 1/T2*) was assessed in vivo by 1.5 T CMR in the cardiac septum. Chemical CIC was assessed by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy in endomyocardial catheter biopsies (EMBs) from cardiac septum taken during follow up of 11 minipigs on dextran-iron loading, and also in full-wall biopsies from cardiac septum, taken post-mortem in another 16 minipigs, after completed iron loading.

RESULTS: A strong correlation could be demonstrated between chemical CIC in 55 EMBs and parallel cardiac T2* (Spearman rank correlation coefficient 0.72, P < 0.001). Regression analysis led to [CIC] = (R2* - 17.16)/41.12 for the calibration equation with CIC in mg/g dry weight and R2* in Hz. An even stronger correlation was found, when chemical CIC was measured by full-wall biopsies from cardiac septum, taken immediately after euthanasia, in connection with the last CMR session after finished iron loading (Spearman rank correlation coefficient 0.95 (P < 0.001). Regression analysis led to the calibration equation [CIC] = (R2* - 17.2)/31.8.

CONCLUSIONS: Calibration of cardiac T2* by EMBs is possible in the minipig model but is less accurate than by full-wall biopsies. Likely explanations are sampling error, variable content of non-iron containing tissue and smaller biopsies, when using catheter biopsies. The results further validate the CMR T2* technique for estimation of cardiac iron in conditions with iron overload and add to the limited calibration data published earlier.

Original languageEnglish
Article number27
JournalJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Volume23
Issue number1
Number of pages16
ISSN1097-6647
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Mar 2021

Keywords

  • Cardiac iron
  • Cardiosiderosis
  • Dextran-iron loading
  • Minipig model
  • T2* calibration
  • T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'In vivo calibration of the T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance method at 1.5 T for estimation of cardiac iron in a minipig model of transfusional iron overload'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this