Abstract
The focus of this paper is the validation and comparison of simplified numerical models of the mechanical rolling process used in tube to tubesheet joints. The investigated models is an axisymmetric model and planar models with plane strain and stress. There are different pros and cons for the different simplified models and therefore they are compared to an experiment where all geometries are measured before and after expansion. This comparison gives an insight into when the different models are valid. The models investigated is an axisymmetric model, a simple 2D expansion model with both plane strain and stress assumptions. Therefore, it is desirable to investigate how close these simplified models can predict the geometry changes after expansion measured in the experiment. The conclusion of the paper is that a planer model with plane strain is the best model at predicting the actual deformation after expansion.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings of the ASME 2015 International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition : Advanced Manufacturing |
Number of pages | 8 |
Volume | 2B |
Publisher | American Society of Mechanical Engineers |
Publication date | 2015 |
Article number | IMECE2015-53636 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-0-7918-5736-6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Event | ASME 2015 International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition - Houston, TX, United States Duration: 13 Nov 2015 → 19 Nov 2015 http://www.asmeconferences.org/IMECE2015/ |
Conference
Conference | ASME 2015 International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition |
---|---|
Country/Territory | United States |
City | Houston, TX |
Period | 13/11/2015 → 19/11/2015 |
Internet address |
Keywords
- Tube Spacing
- Tubesheet Deformation
- Thermal Performance