TY - JOUR
T1 - Is predicted body-composition and relative fat mass an alternative to body-mass index and waist circumference for disease risk estimation
AU - Cichosz, Simon Lebech
AU - Rasmussen, Nicklas Højgaard-Hessellund
AU - Vestergaard, Peter
AU - Hejlesen, Ole
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - Background and aims: New methods to estimate body-composition have recently been proposed, but their relation to diseases, such as diabetes and coronary heart disease, needs further investigation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between proposed prediction of body-composition (PBC); Relative Fat Mass (RFM), Body Mass Index (BMI), Waist Circumference (WC) and disease. Methods: In a cross-sectional cohort (NHANES) the association between the four body measures and diabetes, high blood pressure, coronary heart disease, cancer, arthritis, and hospitalization were assessed. A total of 13,348 people was included in this study. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC), Area Under Curve (AUC) and statistical testing were used to evaluate the differences. Results: PBC/RFM had significant higher AUC than BMI or WC for diabetes, high blood pressure, hospitalization, and arthritis. PBC had a significant higher AUC than RFM, BMI, WC for Cancer and coronary heart disease. Conclusions: RFM and PBC could be a better indicator to distinguish amongst people with a risk of diseases compared to traditional measures such as BMI and WC. However, future studies need to investigate the longitudinal association between RFM, PBC and the risk of disease development to assess if these measures are better suited for risk-stratification.
AB - Background and aims: New methods to estimate body-composition have recently been proposed, but their relation to diseases, such as diabetes and coronary heart disease, needs further investigation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between proposed prediction of body-composition (PBC); Relative Fat Mass (RFM), Body Mass Index (BMI), Waist Circumference (WC) and disease. Methods: In a cross-sectional cohort (NHANES) the association between the four body measures and diabetes, high blood pressure, coronary heart disease, cancer, arthritis, and hospitalization were assessed. A total of 13,348 people was included in this study. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC), Area Under Curve (AUC) and statistical testing were used to evaluate the differences. Results: PBC/RFM had significant higher AUC than BMI or WC for diabetes, high blood pressure, hospitalization, and arthritis. PBC had a significant higher AUC than RFM, BMI, WC for Cancer and coronary heart disease. Conclusions: RFM and PBC could be a better indicator to distinguish amongst people with a risk of diseases compared to traditional measures such as BMI and WC. However, future studies need to investigate the longitudinal association between RFM, PBC and the risk of disease development to assess if these measures are better suited for risk-stratification.
KW - Arthritis
KW - Body mass index
KW - Cancer
KW - Coronary heart disease
KW - Diabetes
KW - High blood pressure
KW - Hospitalization
KW - Predicted body composition
KW - Waist circumference
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135994034&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.dsx.2022.102590
DO - 10.1016/j.dsx.2022.102590
M3 - Journal article
SN - 1871-4021
VL - 16
JO - Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews
JF - Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews
IS - 9
M1 - 102590
ER -