Is regional planning dead or just coping? The transformation of a state sociospatial project into growth-oriented strategies

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)
365 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

How is regional planning transformed in increasingly changing socioeconomic and political contexts? How are regional planning policies and practices ultimately shaped and why? With this paper I propose and apply an analytical model based on notions of state theory, state spatial selectivity, new planning spaces, and policy discourses to examine how regional planning has evolved in the course of the past four or so decades. On the basis of an analysis concerned with the history and evolution of Danish regional planning I argue that regional planning has shifted away from being a sociospatial and welfarist state project towards being a domain characterised by growth-oriented strategies that stand for neoliberal political agendas. In analysing this process I show that hierarchical forms of governance and statutory mechanisms embedded within them have been largely substituted by emerging soft spaces of governance and flexible policies intended to destabilise formal planning arenas. Finally, I discuss the fact that the ‘classical–modernist’ steering role of regional planning that once sought to tackle socioeconomic disparities has been replaced by a facilitating role that promotes competitiveness through growth-oriented policy instruments.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEnvironment and Planning C: Government & Policy
Volume30
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)536-552
Number of pages17
ISSN0263-774X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2012
EventAESOP 2012 26th Annual Conference: Planning to Achieve/Planning to Avoid - Ankara, Turkey
Duration: 11 Jul 201214 Jul 2012

Conference

ConferenceAESOP 2012 26th Annual Conference
CountryTurkey
CityAnkara
Period11/07/201214/07/2012

Fingerprint

regional planning
coping
regional planning policy
governance
planning
political agenda
competitiveness
project
discourse
history
policy

Keywords

  • regional planning, planning reorientations, structural reform, spatial planning, planning roles, governance structures, soft governance spaces

Cite this

@article{c51d976b6366488ea5763e924ca4952c,
title = "Is regional planning dead or just coping?: The transformation of a state sociospatial project into growth-oriented strategies",
abstract = "How is regional planning transformed in increasingly changing socioeconomic and political contexts? How are regional planning policies and practices ultimately shaped and why? With this paper I propose and apply an analytical model based on notions of state theory, state spatial selectivity, new planning spaces, and policy discourses to examine how regional planning has evolved in the course of the past four or so decades. On the basis of an analysis concerned with the history and evolution of Danish regional planning I argue that regional planning has shifted away from being a sociospatial and welfarist state project towards being a domain characterised by growth-oriented strategies that stand for neoliberal political agendas. In analysing this process I show that hierarchical forms of governance and statutory mechanisms embedded within them have been largely substituted by emerging soft spaces of governance and flexible policies intended to destabilise formal planning arenas. Finally, I discuss the fact that the ‘classical–modernist’ steering role of regional planning that once sought to tackle socioeconomic disparities has been replaced by a facilitating role that promotes competitiveness through growth-oriented policy instruments.",
keywords = "regional planning, planning reorientations, structural reform, spatial planning, planning roles, governance structures, soft governance spaces",
author = "Daniel Galland",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1068/c11150",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "536--552",
journal = "Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space",
issn = "2399-6544",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "3",

}

Is regional planning dead or just coping? The transformation of a state sociospatial project into growth-oriented strategies. / Galland, Daniel.

In: Environment and Planning C: Government & Policy, Vol. 30, No. 3, 06.2012, p. 536-552.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is regional planning dead or just coping?

T2 - The transformation of a state sociospatial project into growth-oriented strategies

AU - Galland, Daniel

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - How is regional planning transformed in increasingly changing socioeconomic and political contexts? How are regional planning policies and practices ultimately shaped and why? With this paper I propose and apply an analytical model based on notions of state theory, state spatial selectivity, new planning spaces, and policy discourses to examine how regional planning has evolved in the course of the past four or so decades. On the basis of an analysis concerned with the history and evolution of Danish regional planning I argue that regional planning has shifted away from being a sociospatial and welfarist state project towards being a domain characterised by growth-oriented strategies that stand for neoliberal political agendas. In analysing this process I show that hierarchical forms of governance and statutory mechanisms embedded within them have been largely substituted by emerging soft spaces of governance and flexible policies intended to destabilise formal planning arenas. Finally, I discuss the fact that the ‘classical–modernist’ steering role of regional planning that once sought to tackle socioeconomic disparities has been replaced by a facilitating role that promotes competitiveness through growth-oriented policy instruments.

AB - How is regional planning transformed in increasingly changing socioeconomic and political contexts? How are regional planning policies and practices ultimately shaped and why? With this paper I propose and apply an analytical model based on notions of state theory, state spatial selectivity, new planning spaces, and policy discourses to examine how regional planning has evolved in the course of the past four or so decades. On the basis of an analysis concerned with the history and evolution of Danish regional planning I argue that regional planning has shifted away from being a sociospatial and welfarist state project towards being a domain characterised by growth-oriented strategies that stand for neoliberal political agendas. In analysing this process I show that hierarchical forms of governance and statutory mechanisms embedded within them have been largely substituted by emerging soft spaces of governance and flexible policies intended to destabilise formal planning arenas. Finally, I discuss the fact that the ‘classical–modernist’ steering role of regional planning that once sought to tackle socioeconomic disparities has been replaced by a facilitating role that promotes competitiveness through growth-oriented policy instruments.

KW - regional planning, planning reorientations, structural reform, spatial planning, planning roles, governance structures, soft governance spaces

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862684436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1068/c11150

DO - 10.1068/c11150

M3 - Journal article

VL - 30

SP - 536

EP - 552

JO - Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space

JF - Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space

SN - 2399-6544

IS - 3

ER -