Is structural hydroxyapatite tricalcium-phosphate graft or tricortical iliac crest autograft better for calcaneal lengthening osteotomy in childhood? interim results from a randomised, controlled non-inferiority study

P Martinkevich, Ole Rahbek, M Stilling, L K Pedersen, M Gottliebsen, K Søballe, B Møller-Madsen

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

AIMS: To compare the structural durability of hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate (HATCP) to autologous iliac crest bone graft in calcaneal lengthening osteotomy (CLO) for pes planovalgus in childhood.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We present the interim results of ten patients (HATCP, n = 6 and autograft, n = 5) with a mean age of 11.5 years (8.2 to 14.2) from a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial with six months follow-up. The primary outcome was the stability of the osteotomy as measured by radiostereometric analysis. A non-inferiority margin of ≤ 2 mm osteotomy compression was set.

RESULTS: At six months the data showed that the osteotomy had been compressed by a mean 1.97 mm (99.8% confidence interval -1.65 to 5.60) more in the HATCP group than in the autograft group. Migration of the CLO grafted with HATCP stabilised at six months rather than at six weeks with autograft.

CONCLUSION: This is the first randomised trial to compare the efficacy of HATCP graft with autograft in terms of stability of CLO in children. Because of problems with the HATCP the trial was stopped. We do not recommend HATCP graft in its current structure for use in unfixed CLOs. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1554-62.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery: British Volume
Volume98-B
Issue number11
Pages (from-to)1554-1562
Number of pages9
ISSN2049-4394
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is structural hydroxyapatite tricalcium-phosphate graft or tricortical iliac crest autograft better for calcaneal lengthening osteotomy in childhood? interim results from a randomised, controlled non-inferiority study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this