Projects per year
Abstract
This study provides LCA reference benchmarks for residential buildings in Northern Italy and
Denmark. Furthermore, the benchmark derivation process is analysed to highlight the trade-offs
that relate to the methodological choices made by benchmark developers, considering the
objectives of the stakeholders. Reference benchmarks for the two contexts are calculated based
on national samples of residential buildings. A comparative analysis pinpoints the
methodological factors regarding system boundaries, inventory requirements and databases
that, from a calculation aspect, affect the benchmarks. Results thus highlight the uniqueness of
each benchmarking system put into practice, and emphasize the need for clear calculation rules
and transparency within each benchmark system. The identified trade-offs from the derivation
process furthermore indicate the inherent need to balance the different interests relating to the
stakeholders’ roles when applying the benchmark. The mapping of different trade-offs presented
in this study provides benchmark stakeholders with an overview that allows for open discussion
about which priorities and choices will fit a specific context of benchmark application.
Denmark. Furthermore, the benchmark derivation process is analysed to highlight the trade-offs
that relate to the methodological choices made by benchmark developers, considering the
objectives of the stakeholders. Reference benchmarks for the two contexts are calculated based
on national samples of residential buildings. A comparative analysis pinpoints the
methodological factors regarding system boundaries, inventory requirements and databases
that, from a calculation aspect, affect the benchmarks. Results thus highlight the uniqueness of
each benchmarking system put into practice, and emphasize the need for clear calculation rules
and transparency within each benchmark system. The identified trade-offs from the derivation
process furthermore indicate the inherent need to balance the different interests relating to the
stakeholders’ roles when applying the benchmark. The mapping of different trade-offs presented
in this study provides benchmark stakeholders with an overview that allows for open discussion
about which priorities and choices will fit a specific context of benchmark application.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Building Research and Information |
Volume | 47 |
Issue number | 7 |
Pages (from-to) | 833-849 |
Number of pages | 17 |
ISSN | 0961-3218 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 30 May 2019 |
Keywords
- LCA practice
- Life cycle assessment
- benchmarking
- embodied impacts
- residential buildings
- trade-offs
Projects
- 2 Finished
-
IEA EBC Annex 72: Assessing life cycle related environmental impacts caused by buildings
Birgisdottir, H. & Rasmussen, F. N.
01/11/2017 → 31/10/2021
Project: Research
-
Low carbon design strategies in method and practice
Rasmussen, F. N., Birkved, M. & Birgisdottir, H.
01/06/2015 → 31/03/2020
Project: Research