TY - JOUR
T1 - Method for comparing efficiency and system integration potential for biomass-based fuels production pathways
AU - Krogh, Andreas
AU - Lozano, Eliana M.
AU - Thellufsen, Jakob Z.
AU - Grue, Jeppe
AU - Pedersen, Thomas H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
PY - 2022/11/20
Y1 - 2022/11/20
N2 - Biomass are seen as an important resource for fuel production in the maritime and aviation sectors. Sustainable biomass, however, is a limited resource and it is therefore important to utilize it as efficiently as possible. This study developed a modelling frame to compare the performance of various fuel production pathways from lignocellulosic biomass. It considers both the energy efficiencies of the processes and their potential to be integrated into future fossil free energy systems. The model provides a general framework for converting experimental results and process simulation to higher level techno-economic- and life-cycle analysis in a comparable manner. In this study the performance of six technology pathways from three different categories; direct liquefaction, power-to-X, and gas-to-liquid, were evaluated. The results showed that from a socio-economic perspective investment into renewable electricity and hydrogen production were the dominating factors. This resulted in the direct liquefaction options being both the cheapest and most energy efficient while the power-to-X options were the most expensive and less efficient. On the other hand, the extensive use of hydrogen in power-to-X and gas-to-liquid pathways allows for a high utilization of the carbon content in the biomass.
AB - Biomass are seen as an important resource for fuel production in the maritime and aviation sectors. Sustainable biomass, however, is a limited resource and it is therefore important to utilize it as efficiently as possible. This study developed a modelling frame to compare the performance of various fuel production pathways from lignocellulosic biomass. It considers both the energy efficiencies of the processes and their potential to be integrated into future fossil free energy systems. The model provides a general framework for converting experimental results and process simulation to higher level techno-economic- and life-cycle analysis in a comparable manner. In this study the performance of six technology pathways from three different categories; direct liquefaction, power-to-X, and gas-to-liquid, were evaluated. The results showed that from a socio-economic perspective investment into renewable electricity and hydrogen production were the dominating factors. This resulted in the direct liquefaction options being both the cheapest and most energy efficient while the power-to-X options were the most expensive and less efficient. On the other hand, the extensive use of hydrogen in power-to-X and gas-to-liquid pathways allows for a high utilization of the carbon content in the biomass.
KW - Direct liquefaction
KW - Energy system integration
KW - Gas to liquid
KW - Lignocellulosic biomass
KW - Power to X
KW - Sustainable fuel
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139019340&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134336
DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134336
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85139019340
SN - 0959-6526
VL - 376
JO - Journal of Cleaner Production
JF - Journal of Cleaner Production
M1 - 134336
ER -