– Contradictory accounts in empirical material are often perceived as deliberate “lies” or “misleading deceptions” performed in acts of impression management, or they are simply neglected. When observed in the material collected empirically, methods have been developed in order to identify and remove them from the analytical work. The purpose of this paper is to re-visit and re-introduce a dissensus-based management research strategy in order to analytically be able to work with what appear to be contradictions and misinformation in qualitative research accounts, and give them a more profound role in the understanding of management ideas, work and practices.
|Translated title of the contribution||Modsigelser i kvalitativ management research: Consensus og dissensus perspektiver på indtryk, identitet, og ledelsesarbejde|
|Journal||Baltic Journal of Management|
|Publication status||Published - 7 Jan 2016|