Negative laparoscopy unveiled

John Jarrell*, Lars Arendt-Nielsen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Studies indicate a variable proportion of laparoscopies done for the management of non-acute pelvic pain that do not identify visible pathology and are called negative laparoscopies. Possible explanations have included undetected endometriosis, observer error, and/or neural tissues in the endometrium acting as nociceptive input. The goal was to compare demographic and pain testing measures between women with negative laparoscopies and confirmed endometriosis in a cohort of women presenting with chronic pelvic pain. Methods: Women with chronic pelvic pain (n = 255) provided written consent for the study prior to entry. Data were collected at the time of clinic visit and entered contemporaneously into SPSS. Pain sensitization was identified as the presence of cutaneous allodynia. Clinical, pain, and pain sensitization variables were compared using Student’s t-test. Results: The frequency of negative laparoscopy was 13.7% (35 cases) and that of confirmed endometriosis was 27.1% (69 cases). There were no differences between women with a negative laparoscopy and women with confirmed endometriosis in clinical, dysmenorrhea, or pain testing measurements. Conclusion: The data suggest in the absence of endometriotic tissue in the pelvis, chronic visceral pain may result from a uterine origin and result in a generalized pattern of pain and pain sensitization.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders
Volume10
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)18-21
Number of pages4
ISSN2284-0265
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2018

Keywords

  • endometriosis
  • Negative laparoscopy
  • pain sensitization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Negative laparoscopy unveiled'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this